BloodFlow.c

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few seconds ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
Fixed merge conflicts.

  1. … 7 more files in changeset.
Bamboo Commit: Updated the Copyright section and replaced tabs with 4 spaces

  1. … 14 more files in changeset.
RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

Merge branch 'DENBUG-59-fw-duplicate-alarms-occur-during-post-treatment-rinseback-and-block-workflow' into develop

  1. … 2 more files in changeset.
Done.

Done.

Fixed merge conflicts.

  1. … 7 more files in changeset.
RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

Removed.

Removed.

Fixed.

Fixed.

DEN-14815: Switched to new CPLD based AC power loss check function.

  1. … 7 more files in changeset.
Remove commented / unused code. If it is to be used, it does not check for overflow.

Remove commented / unused code. If it is to be used, it does not check for overflow.

Add currentPostTreatmentState to header

Add currentPostTreatmentState to header

HD-DEN-14815_Cartridge Removal Screen IS Displayed Prematurely
HD-DEN-14815_Cartridge Removal Screen IS Displayed Prematurely
DGFault instead of Dfault

DGFault instead of Dfault

DENBUG-59: Addressed code review comments.

  1. … 1 more file in changeset.
Fixed merge conflicts.

  1. … 7 more files in changeset.
DENBUG-59: Addressed some unit test issues.

  1. … 4 more files in changeset.
RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

Wouldn't we want to stop if an alarm occurred during recirculation, which affected the blood circuit? My inclination would be to manage which alarms were enabled in this state rather than not imple...

Wouldn't we want to stop if an alarm occurred during recirculation, which affected the blood circuit? My inclination would be to manage which alarms were enabled in this state rather than not implement the mechanism to stop the pumps.

Implementing the change.
Done.

Should blood recirc blocked be based on alarm properties (as you've written here) or based on whether user stopped (specifically)? My feeling is that since there is no blood in blood side of circui...

Should blood recirc blocked be based on alarm properties (as you've written here) or based on whether user stopped (specifically)? My feeling is that since there is no blood in blood side of circuit (because rinseback was completed before we got to recirc), the NoBloodRecirc alarm property maybe doesn't apply here and we should only stop BP if the user stop alarm is active.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.