Drivers

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few seconds ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
As per Sean's comment mark it as resolved

As per Sean's comment mark it as resolved

marking it as resolved since this is a temporary driver

marking it as resolved since this is a temporary driver

I am marking it as resolved since it is temporary driver

I am marking it as resolved since it is temporary driver

Its like we need to compile the safe library and include it. But if we are using only memcpy and memset, memcmp and static code analyzer check the destination buffer size , I am marking it as resolved

Its like we need to compile the safe library and include it. But if we are using only memcpy and memset, memcmp and static code analyzer check the destination buffer size , I am marking it as resolved

I think you are seeing previous commit. It is not there in the present code.

I think you are seeing previous commit. It is not there in the present code.

Done. Thank you.

Done. Thank you.

Changed. Thank you.

Changed. Thank you.

is it merge issue ?

is it merge issue ?

If it is not used for serial message, its OK, but if you are opting for packing , club it together , in line number 36 , or bring that structure defined on top to here

If it is not used for serial message, its OK, but if you are opting for packing , club it together , in line number 36 , or bring that structure defined on top to here

Please bring public functions on top. check it for all function in this file , except test functions

Please bring public functions on top. check it for all function in this file , except test functions

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil this structure is not used to message handling.

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil this structure is not used to message handling.

Dara Navaei, this is not a CAN message payload, but it does look like a sensor serial message payload. I'm assuming this code works, so sensor does not expect a packed structure?

Dara Navaei, this is not a CAN message payload, but it does look like a sensor serial message payload. I'm assuming this code works, so sensor does not expect a packed structure?

Resolved

Resolved

Change comment from 3 to 5 minutes to match code.

Change comment from 3 to 5 minutes to match code.

I don't see fix

I don't see fix

Fixed the ordering

Fixed the ordering

I'm confused as to why the available alarm that this alarm replaced is in a different row within this table. That seems wrong.

I'm confused as to why the available alarm that this alarm replaced is in a different row within this table. That seems wrong.

structure packing missing

structure packing missing

Do not mix static and public function, let all public function on top and static bottom, except override and test functions

Do not mix static and public function, let all public function on top and static bottom, except override and test functions

Handled in FPOperationModes and respective states of PreGen have it.

Handled in FPOperationModes and respective states of PreGen have it.

Checked with Eliza if they need it for alarm persistence time. Not needed at this time, we can add them in future

Checked with Eliza if they need it for alarm persistence time. Not needed at this time, we can add them in future

Fixed. Thanks

Fixed. Thanks

Fixed.

Fixed.

Fixed.

Fixed.

Fixed. thanks

Fixed. thanks

I don't think the number of samples is what you want as 3rd parameter. You want number of bytes so 4 x number of samples so you should pass "sizeof( roRRSamples )".

I don't think the number of samples is what you want as 3rd parameter. You want number of bytes so 4 x number of samples so you should pass "sizeof( roRRSamples )".

Put space between if and ( for all conditions in this function.

Put space between if and ( for all conditions in this function.