Messaging.c

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few seconds ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
Since fill and drain is a single time request and it is not a frequent request similar to supply during dialysate generation. I removed and now run as idle

Since fill and drain is a single time request and it is not a frequent request similar to supply during dialysate generation. I removed and now run as idle

To make it exclusive operation. no previous request should be pending when a new operation is requested. So only one state machine is running at a time. otherwise, while chamber fill is in progress...

To make it exclusive operation. no previous request should be pending when a new operation is requested. So only one state machine is running at a time. otherwise, while chamber fill is in progress, anyone can request drain and both requests will be handled. even through new code run only one state machine at a time, this will ensure that only one request is submitted to drybicart

This was a concern reported by Sean and proposed for restructuring into a single state machine.

This doesn't look like a valid substate. We should have an enum for valid substates. In default case, we should trigger a s/w fault and also set the state to a valid state (idle or something like t...

This doesn't look like a valid substate. We should have an enum for valid substates. In default case, we should trigger a s/w fault and also set the state to a valid state (idle or something like that).

I think /// was correct. // will not be seen by doxygen.

I think /// was correct. // will not be seen by doxygen.

Not clear, why we are checking fill and supply request here?

Not clear, why we are checking fill and supply request here?

we should use the functions defined in testsupport.c/h -> getU32OverrideValue, getF32OverrideValue based on data type. this needs to be fixed throughout the file.

we should use the functions defined in testsupport.c/h -> getU32OverrideValue, getF32OverrideValue based on data type. this needs to be fixed throughout the file.

space after if. please fix it throughout the files.

space after if. please fix it throughout the files.

I guess, Fill and Drain are priority items than the Supply request, which means upon request of fill and drain, state machine should service that operation. Also, setting supply request should be ...

I guess, Fill and Drain are priority items than the Supply request, which means upon request of fill and drain, state machine should service that operation.

Also, setting supply request should be based on the level sensor later (there shouldn't be any default request -> currently supply is assigned)

Please introduce test config for drybicart selection.

Please introduce test config for drybicart selection.

Fixed it

Fixed it

I think cal data and count should be retrieved by same function and possibly needs some interrupt protection to ensure data and count stick together. If these functions are called from general task...

I think cal data and count should be retrieved by same function and possibly needs some interrupt protection to ensure data and count stick together. If these functions are called from general task, we could have situation where data is retrieved, then priority task updates fpga, and then counter is retrieved with wrong (incremented) counter.
If these two functions are being called from a driver that is executed in priority task, then we don't need to worry about this situation, but still ought to add a constraint/warning comment in function headers noting that these functions should only be called from priority task.

Remove extra blank line.

Remove extra blank line.

It is your comment, so please resolve it.

It is your comment, so please resolve it.

I think Dialin will need get (or UI proxy) commands to have us send cal, s/n, and versions.

I think Dialin will need get (or UI proxy) commands to have us send cal, s/n, and versions.

Do FP sensors have to be treated separately? I realize there needs to be separate messages as they will be coming from different Dialin classes, but can't we handle both messages with same function...

Do FP sensors have to be treated separately? I realize there needs to be separate messages as they will be coming from different Dialin classes, but can't we handle both messages with same function (assuming shared enum to index)?

General Dialin question - does it make sense to override temperatures at driver level where they are spread out over several drivers? I would think overriding at monitor level would be simpler wher...

General Dialin question - does it make sense to override temperatures at driver level where they are spread out over several drivers? I would think overriding at monitor level would be simpler where they are all in one place and could be indexed by enum with single command.

Do we need to say Value?

Do we need to say Value?

Add a blank line after public defs banner. Add a dox comment to the right. I believe they reserve space for 12 bytes, not 10. Not really for calibration - it's for s/n and versions.

Add a blank line after public defs banner.
Add a dox comment to the right.
I believe they reserve space for 12 bytes, not 10.
Not really for calibration - it's for s/n and versions.

Are these really going to be different types? I assumed they would all be floats.

Are these really going to be different types? I assumed they would all be floats.

Structures need a top level dox comment.

Structures need a top level dox comment.

enums need a top level dox comment.

enums need a top level dox comment.

I believe conductivity and temperature data will be F32s.

I believe conductivity and temperature data will be F32s.

Do we not need this anymore? I still see it in code all over the place and I don't think we're done w/ Teensy until Beta 1.9 units are obsolete.

Do we not need this anymore? I still see it in code all over the place and I don't think we're done w/ Teensy until Beta 1.9 units are obsolete.

Merged LDT-2030 and resolved the conflicts

  1. … 6 more files in changeset.
It is replied by Vinay , there is no need to maintain two different rpm. so we can close this.

It is replied by Vinay , there is no need to maintain two different rpm. so we can close this.

It will be fixed in Balancing chamber re-implementation

It will be fixed in Balancing chamber re-implementation

I would prefer to fix this in balancing chamber new algorithm implementation. That is why i didn't mark it as Unresolved.

I would prefer to fix this in balancing chamber new algorithm implementation. That is why i didn't mark it as Unresolved.

fixed it

fixed it

fixed it

fixed it

This state machine running continuously. fill request is initiated for every 1 minutes of balancing chamber exec (since right now level sensor is not working ) //Increment counter for dry bicarb c...

This state machine running continuously. fill request is initiated for every 1 minutes of balancing chamber exec (since right now level sensor is not working )

//Increment counter for dry bicarb chamber fill
bicarbChamberPeriodicFillCounter += 1;
// Fill bicarb chamber once every 60secs.
if ( bicarbChamberPeriodicFillCounter >= BICARB_CHAMBER_PERIODIC_FILL_TIME )

Unknown macro: { setBicarbChamberFillRequested(); bicarbChamberPeriodicFillCounter = 0; }


The request is cleared here. for consistency I am moving to the end of the fill cycle