This is a list of all comments for DG-DEN-5846-1. Review Summary: No summary ---------------------------------------- File: firmware/App/Controllers/Fans.c Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:28 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6364 Blank line between HALCOGEN #includes and others. Alphabetize #includes in each set. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 18:49 > Done Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:50 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by qnguyen on 30 November 2020, 13:47 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6383 Use time interval rather than count. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 18:49 > You mean rename it? Reply by qnguyen on 01 December 2020, 08:56 > Persistent alarm now uses time interval limit rather than > count. So we do not need to divide by the interval here. > This change eliminates the need to know the task interval > in which the checking function is getting called. Reply by Dara Navaei on 04 December 2020, 09:09 > Done Reply by qnguyen on 07 December 2020, 10:45 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:30 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6368 Add "_STATE" to end of each enum name. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 18:52 > Done Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:49 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:29 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6365 Add "states" to end of comment. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 18:52 > Done Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:49 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:30 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6369 Add "_STATE" to end of each enum name. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 18:52 > Done Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:49 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by qnguyen on 30 November 2020, 13:55 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6392 Mispelled Result? Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 18:53 > Done Reply by qnguyen on 01 December 2020, 10:38 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:31 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6370 Our coding standard says constants s/b all caps with underlines (same as #defines). Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 18:55 > Done Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:49 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:31 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6371 Remove extra blank line. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 18:55 > Done Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:49 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:35 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6375 This assignment is always overwritten below. Leave state uninitialized here. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 18:56 > Done Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:47 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:34 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6374 This part of test only makes sense for POST. If we want to re-run this test before each treatment, we would fail this I think. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 18:57 > Yes, that is true. We never check for RPM being 0 after POST. Reply by Dara Navaei on 04 December 2020, 09:32 > Removed part that was checking for 0 RPM. Reply by Sean Nash on 07 December 2020, 10:49 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:37 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6376 Fix comment. "They should be above...". Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 18:58 > This comment is above the for loop. Are you saying it should > be above the if statement? Reply by Dara Navaei on 07 December 2020, 12:53 > Fixed the sentence. Reply by Sean Nash on 09 December 2020, 11:44 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by qnguyen on 30 November 2020, 13:51 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6388 Set result to pass before running the for loop. Remove failure count and set self test result to fail in place where we increase failure count. We can get rid of this if else. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 19:01 > Very good point. Done. Reply by qnguyen on 01 December 2020, 10:39 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:40 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6378 This comment should fit on one line. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 19:02 > Done. Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:47 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:42 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6379 Why is this else (decreasing) not symmetric with increasing condition above? Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 19:03 > The decrease is only 0.005, so we are never less that that > and I don't need to check for it. Reply by Dara Navaei on 04 December 2020, 09:21 > Added the if statements to make it symmetrical. Reply by Sean Nash on 07 December 2020, 10:48 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:44 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6380 Should these monitor functions be called from top of exec? Why only in running state? Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 20:19 > Yes. I put at the top of this function. Because there are > only two states and most of times we are running the fans. I > also did not want to monitor the fans every 50ms so I put it > here to monitor the fans whenever it is time to control the > fans. Reply by Dara Navaei on 04 December 2020, 09:13 > Removed this function from here and moved it to execFans. Reply by Sean Nash on 07 December 2020, 10:47 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:46 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6382 This function should probably be called at top of monitor function. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 20:21 > Moved it to the monitor function. Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:45 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 14:12 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6399 Why only a maximum speed? I would think a minimum speed would be more important. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 20:23 > Added a check for minimum RPM assuming the RPMs should never > be zero. Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:42 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:48 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6384 100 should be 100.0. If we use this in other places, maybe it can be a common #define. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 20:25 > I didn't realize we have this in common.h. I used that. Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:44 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. ---------------------------------------- File: firmware/App/Controllers/Heaters.c Revision Comment by pmontazemi on 01 December 2020, 08:42 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6478 Replace with TODO Reply by Dara Navaei on 01 December 2020, 09:23 > Done Reply by pmontazemi on 01 December 2020, 10:55 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. ---------------------------------------- File: firmware/App/Controllers/TemperatureSensors.c Revision Comment by qnguyen on 30 November 2020, 13:45 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6381 Revert this change. Persistent alarm uses time period instead of count. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 20:30 > Done Reply by qnguyen on 07 December 2020, 10:45 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:06 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6355 Why is bit count declared like a floating point? Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 20:31 > Done. I will cast them. Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:52 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:07 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6356 Why is temperature published so frequently? Was 1 Hz really too slow? Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 20:32 > I agree. It must have been from the past. Changed it to 1Hz. Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:52 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:08 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6357 What does this comment mean? Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 20:32 > This showed in the merge. I will test them in the lab and > remove the comments. Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:51 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by pmontazemi on 07 December 2020, 09:57 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6675 align "(" on second line with the beginning of TEMPERATURE on right hand side of "=" sign, do the same with both lines 151 and 153. Reply by Dara Navaei on 07 December 2020, 12:55 > Done Reply by pmontazemi on 09 December 2020, 11:45 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:19 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6359 Our coding standard says constants should be named with all caps and underlines (same as #define). Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 20:38 > Done Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:51 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:13 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6358 This is a one-shot init function, so timing not critical, but I would still do this calculation once and assign to local float, then assign these fields from the local float. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 20:40 > Done Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:51 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by qnguyen on 30 November 2020, 14:05 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6398 We need to set fpga error to 0 to bypass incorrect error count from FPGA. Otherwise, there will be temperature sensor fault alarm sending to HD once DG is running. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 20:41 > This was due to an FPGA bug. It has been fixed and I will > test it. Reply by qnguyen on 01 December 2020, 10:38 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by qnguyen on 07 December 2020, 08:49 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6669 We need to move this check out of else condition and use the if condition. The persistent alarm check function need to be switching between true and false cases to work, otherwise we need to use windowed time count. Reply by Dara Navaei on 07 December 2020, 13:53 > Done Reply by qnguyen on 09 December 2020, 11:40 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by qnguyen on 07 December 2020, 08:51 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6670 Same comment as above. Reply by Dara Navaei on 07 December 2020, 13:53 > Done Reply by qnguyen on 09 December 2020, 11:40 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:21 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6360 Looks like a lot of trouble to align these parameters, and still not aligned. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 20:41 > I aligned them. Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:50 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. ---------------------------------------- File: firmware/App/Controllers/Thermistors.c Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:54 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6391 Bit count will never be fractional. Should declare as integer (4096). If using in a floating point operation, cast it as (F32). Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 20:44 > Done. I will cast it. Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:44 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by qnguyen on 30 November 2020, 13:38 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6377 Persistent alarm has changed to use time period rather than count. Change this to time interval. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 20:45 > Done Reply by qnguyen on 07 December 2020, 10:44 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:50 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6387 Add "_STATE" to end of each enum name and "state" to end of each comment. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 20:47 > Done Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:44 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:51 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6389 Add "_STATE" to end of each enum name and "state" to end of each comment. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 20:47 > Done Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:44 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:56 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6393 Our coding standard says constants s/b all caps with underlines (same as #defines). Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 21:35 > Done Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:43 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by qnguyen on 30 November 2020, 13:33 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6373 Align second line. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 20:48 > Done Reply by qnguyen on 01 December 2020, 10:40 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:58 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6394 Should explain it's an enum or index for the temperature sensor we're getting temperature reading for. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 21:36 > Done Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:43 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 14:01 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6395 Monitor call(s) should probably be made at top of exec so monitoring takes place in all states. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 21:36 > There are only two states. The other state only waits for a > few ms for FPGA to start reading. Also, I didn't want to > monitor the thermistors every 50ms. Reply by Dara Navaei on 04 December 2020, 09:06 > Moved the function to execFans function. Reply by Sean Nash on 07 December 2020, 10:47 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 14:02 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6396 This function should probably be called at top of monitor function. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 21:39 > Done Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:43 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by qnguyen on 07 December 2020, 08:52 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6671 Need to remove if and else if statement and pass the condition to check persistent alarm function. Reply by Dara Navaei on 07 December 2020, 13:01 > I do not understand the comment. Reply by qnguyen on 07 December 2020, 19:41 > The persistent alarm relies on both condition (in range and > out of range) to work. So we only need to call it such as > "checkPersistentAlarm( persist_alarm_id, temperature < > MIN_ALLOWED_TEMPERATURE, temperature, > MIN_ALLOWED_TEMPERATURE )" without the if condition. Reply by Dara Navaei on 09 December 2020, 08:18 > Done Reply by qnguyen on 09 December 2020, 11:39 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 14:04 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6397 This large comment should probably be moved into the function brief so SDD can benefit. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 21:41 > Done Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:42 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by qnguyen on 30 November 2020, 14:13 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6400 Generally, we have two lines before and after this comment to separate test functions and normal code. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 21:41 > Done Reply by qnguyen on 07 December 2020, 10:45 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. ---------------------------------------- File: firmware/source/sys_main.c Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 11:22 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6345 Move these init functions up in order with other controller/monitor init functions. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 21:54 > Done Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:54 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. ---------------------------------------- File: firmware/App/Controllers/Fans.h Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:23 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6361 Don't need "name" in these enum and type names and maybe add "DG" (e.g. DG_Fans, NUM_OF_DG_FANS and DG_FANS_T). If keeping "name", at least fix grammar (e.g. fan_names, NUM_OF_FAN_NAMES and FAN_NAMES_T). Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 20:25 > Done Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:50 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:26 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6362 Fix comment - s/b PWM duty cycle %. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 20:27 > I have been changing all the PWM to duty cycle, I just didn't > see this one. Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:50 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:27 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6363 Change name to getMeasuredFanRPM() to distinguish commanded speed from measured speed (even though there is no commanded speed in this case). Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 20:29 > I didn't have measured because there is not commanded as you > mentioned. But changed the name. Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:50 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. ---------------------------------------- File: firmware/App/Controllers/Thermistors.h Revision Comment by qnguyen on 30 November 2020, 13:32 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6372 Remove extra line. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 21:42 > Done Reply by qnguyen on 01 December 2020, 10:40 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:49 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6385 Name not needed in enum name. Consider dg_Thermistors instead. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 21:42 > Done Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:44 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. ---------------------------------------- File: firmware/App/Drivers/InternalADC.h Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 11:24 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6346 Are these new channels added to map in InternalADC.c? Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 21:45 > Now added them. Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:54 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. ---------------------------------------- File: firmware/App/Services/FPGA.c Revision Comment by pmontazemi on 01 December 2020, 08:45 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6479 There should not be any data received at this time Reply by Dara Navaei on 01 December 2020, 09:24 > You mean change the sentence? Reply by Dara Navaei on 04 December 2020, 09:05 > Done Reply by pmontazemi on 07 December 2020, 10:33 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. ---------------------------------------- File: firmware/App/Services/SystemComm.c Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 11:26 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6347 Why removed? Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 21:45 > It was removed from this branch. It is still available in the > RO pump branch. Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:53 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. ---------------------------------------- File: firmware/App/Services/SystemCommMessages.c Revision Comment by qnguyen on 30 November 2020, 13:29 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6366 Missing param name. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 21:50 > I have not seen the parameter name in these functions. I > added it. Reply by qnguyen on 01 December 2020, 10:41 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by qnguyen on 30 November 2020, 13:29 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6367 Missing param name. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 21:51 > Done Reply by qnguyen on 01 December 2020, 10:41 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by qnguyen on 07 December 2020, 08:54 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6672 Mismatch function names. Reply by Dara Navaei on 07 December 2020, 12:59 > Done Reply by qnguyen on 09 December 2020, 11:39 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by qnguyen on 07 December 2020, 08:55 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6673 Mismatch function name. Reply by Dara Navaei on 07 December 2020, 12:57 > Done Reply by qnguyen on 09 December 2020, 11:39 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by qnguyen on 07 December 2020, 08:55 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6674 Mismatch function name. Reply by Dara Navaei on 07 December 2020, 12:56 > Done Reply by qnguyen on 09 December 2020, 11:38 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. ---------------------------------------- File: firmware/App/Services/SystemCommMessages.h Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 12:58 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6351 Alphabetize #includes. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 21:57 > Done Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:53 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 12:59 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6352 Other broadcast functions appear to be grouped above. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 21:58 > Ok. I am not sure if git will like this. Done. Reply by Sean Nash on 01 December 2020, 10:53 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. Revision Comment by Sean Nash on 30 November 2020, 13:00 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1#c6353 Keep the word "Test" in these Dialin message handling functions. Reply by Dara Navaei on 30 November 2020, 22:01 > Could you please elaborate? Reply by Dara Navaei on 04 December 2020, 09:35 > Done Reply by Sean Nash on 07 December 2020, 10:49 > RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH. --- ID: DG-DEN-5846-1 https://devapps.diality.us/cru/DG-DEN-5846-1 Title: DG-DEN-5846_DG Ambient Temperature Statement of Objectives: State: Closed Summary: Author: Dara Navaei Moderator: Dara Navaei Reviewers: (0 active, 3 completed*) qnguyen (*) Sean Nash (*) pmontazemi (*)