Index: sources/canbus/MessageDispatcher.cpp
===================================================================
diff -u -rc8da96049610870d3a8c9c00edc04f80ae62085f -r6abfb957108b171a8a5ab6770ad9b463235c210b
--- sources/canbus/MessageDispatcher.cpp	(.../MessageDispatcher.cpp)	(revision c8da96049610870d3a8c9c00edc04f80ae62085f)
+++ sources/canbus/MessageDispatcher.cpp	(.../MessageDispatcher.cpp)	(revision 6abfb957108b171a8a5ab6770ad9b463235c210b)
@@ -88,6 +88,10 @@
  */
 void MessageDispatcher::initConnections()
 {
+    // Message transmit
+    connect(&_ApplicationController, SIGNAL(didActionTransmit(const QVariantList &)),
+            this                   ,   SLOT( onActionTransmit(const QVariantList &)));
+
     // From HD
     connect(&_FrameInterface       , SIGNAL(didFrameReceive  (Can_Id          , const QByteArray   &)),
             this                   ,   SLOT( onFrameReceive  (Can_Id          , const QByteArray   &)));
@@ -227,6 +231,51 @@
     _interpreter.updateUnhandledMessages();
 }
 
+void MessageDispatcher::actionTransmit(const QVariantList &vData, Sequence vSequence)
+{
+    // For dry demo
+    txCount();
+    if (vSequence == 0) { // initialize
+        // it's obvious that this assignment does not effect outside of the function.
+        // but is make it easier to just assume the correct value has been passed
+        // and still using the same variable (function parameter) as a local variable.
+        vSequence = _txSequence;
+    }
+
+    QByteArray mData;
+    Can_Id canid = static_cast<Can_Id>(vData[1].toUInt());
+
+    for (int i = 2; i < vData.size(); ++i) {
+        mData += Format::fromVariant(vData[i]);
+        qDebug() << "Data" << mData << vData[i];
+    }
+
+    FrameList frameList;
+    Sequence mSequence = vSequence;
+    bool mNeedsAcknow = false; //needsAcknow(vCanId);
+    if (mNeedsAcknow) {
+        mSequence = -mSequence;
+    }
+
+    // disabled coco begin validated: Has been tested manually but in this function this cannot be false because the message interpreter is doing the same  validation.
+    // still checking here in case the logic has changed therefore buildFrame should still validate the message for developer safety.
+    if ( ! _builder.buildFrames(vData[0].toUInt(), mData, frameList, mSequence) ) {
+        LOG_DEBUG(QString("Incorrect Message cannot be built"));  // TODO : LogInfo Improvement
+        qDebug() << "Cannot build message";
+        return;
+    }
+    // disabled coco end
+    if (mNeedsAcknow) {
+        // NOTE : here vSequence should be used which is not negative
+        // because when we get the Acknow it is not the negative
+        // since it does not need Re-Acknow
+        // and this is the sequence number which will be used
+        // to remove the message from the Acknow list.
+        //emit didAcknowTransmit(canid, vSequence, frameList);
+    }
+    framesTransmit(canid, frameList);
+}
+
 /*!
  * \brief   MessageDispatcher::actionTransmit
  * \details This method is called by slot MessageDispatcher::onActionTransmit
@@ -247,16 +296,17 @@
 
     quint8 vActionId = 0;
     QByteArray mData;
-    Can_Id canid = vCanId;
+    Can_Id canid = Can::Can_Id::eChlid_UI_HD; // TODO figure out //vCanId;
     if (! _interpreter.interpretMessage(vData, mData, canid)) {
         LOG_DEBUG(QString("Incorrect Message, cannot be interpreted, %1").arg(Format::toHexString(vActionId))); // TODO : LogInfo Improvement
+        qDebug() << "Cannot Interpret";
         return;
     }
-
+    qDebug() << "Got to action" << mData << vCanId << vData[0];
     // TODO : Create a buildFrames method
     FrameList frameList;
     Sequence mSequence = vSequence;
-    bool mNeedsAcknow = needsAcknow(vCanId);
+    bool mNeedsAcknow = false; //needsAcknow(vCanId);
     if (mNeedsAcknow) {
         mSequence = -mSequence;
         if ( ! gDisableAcknowLog ) {
@@ -269,8 +319,9 @@
 
     // disabled coco begin validated: Has been tested manually but in this function this cannot be false because the message interpreter is doing the same  validation.
     // still checking here in case the logic has changed therefore buildFrame should still validate the message for developer safety.
-    if ( ! _builder.buildFrames(mData, frameList, mSequence) ) {
+    if ( ! _builder.buildFrames(0, mData, frameList, mSequence) ) {
         LOG_DEBUG(QString("Incorrect Message cannot be built"));  // TODO : LogInfo Improvement
+        qDebug() << "Cannot build message";
         return;
     }
     // disabled coco end