UI-DEN-14909

UI-DEN-14909

Activity on this page:

Line History

Line history chart not available

Line history chart not available

 

Stats

Commits this week: 1
Total Commits: 3,304
Last Commit: 16 Dec
Commits this week: 1

Commit Activity

Commits By Day In Week
52 week commits volume
Commits By Day In Week
Commits by day
Commits By Day In Week
Commits by hour
Commits By Hour In Day
Commit calendar
 
Tuesday 14 Mar 2023
4:18 pm

vduong  (deleted user)

4:18 pm

vduong  (deleted user)

12:51 pm

jishii  (deleted user) and Behrouz NematiPour

11:49 am

Behrouz NematiPour

RESOLVED

RESOLVED

11:40 am

Behrouz NematiPour

RESOLVED

RESOLVED

11:40 am

Behrouz NematiPour

RESOLVED

RESOLVED

11:39 am

Behrouz NematiPour

RESOLVED

RESOLVED

11:08 am

vduong  (deleted user)

Yes, i will remove the Retangle and set the color as we did before, with the change that the Slider's color for active will be a SliderHighlightColor / Orange instead of the light blue

Yes, i will remove the Retangle and set the color as we did before, with the change that the Slider's color for active will be a SliderHighlightColor / Orange instead of the light blue

11:02 am

jishii  (deleted user) and Behrouz NematiPour

10:46 am

vduong  (deleted user)

I have a possible better solution that will avoid both. I will implement and push the code.

I have a possible better solution that will avoid both. I will implement and push the code.

Monday 13 Mar 2023
2:08 pm

Behrouz NematiPour

RESOLVED. Thanks for the test, that is what I remembered. Fine then

RESOLVED.

Thanks for the test, that is what I remembered.
Fine then

2:02 pm

Behrouz NematiPour

1 - The component instance has been used in the same file, and that is the new feature, and previously we have to create a file to use the component instance, or directly return the created compone...

1 - The component instance has been used in the same file, and that is the new feature, and previously we have to create a file to use the component instance, or directly return the created component for one instance use.
2 - The Loader is used inside of the component, which doesn't seem right, the idea is to use inline components so, if possible, avoid loaders.
3 - Multiple components for the line tickmarks and round ones are created since it seems only a property change to make it rounded, since QML doesn't have a line or circle and all are Rectangle, it makes sense to update the underlying rectangle properties to get the desired shape.

1:43 pm

Behrouz NematiPour

Thanks, Sorry for the confusion. Yes, please, as we talked, the active progress should be orange, and the background I think can stay as it was. Then you can remove that extra Rectangle.

Thanks,
Sorry for the confusion.
Yes, please, as we talked, the active progress should be orange, and the background I think can stay as it was.
Then you can remove that extra Rectangle.

1:00 pm

vduong  (deleted user)

This may be a new concept for the project, but it's something that I've used and have seen used before in other QML projects. This also guarantees that you are only loading the object when you nee...

This may be a new concept for the project, but it's something that I've used and have seen used before in other QML projects.

This also guarantees that you are only loading the object when you need it when you use it with the Loader.

The Component itself, if you look at the Qt documentation, you will find "The component encapsulates the QML types within, as if they were defined in a separate QML file, and is not loaded until requested (in this case, by the two Loader objects)."

So, I am sure this is efficient.

12:56 pm

vduong  (deleted user)

We had this discussion this morning, I have already tested it also. It is working as we expected. It only prints out the round tick's Component.onCompleted log messages of the round tick marks and ...

We had this discussion this morning, I have already tested it also. It is working as we expected. It only prints out the round tick's Component.onCompleted log messages of the round tick marks and not both the round and lined tick marks. This is operating as we expected.

12:55 pm

vduong  (deleted user)

Ok, easy change over.

Ok, easy change over.

12:55 pm

vduong  (deleted user)

We had a discussion about what needed to be done and you had mentioned that the progressRect would be transparent. In order for that to be transparent, we needed a background rectangle color. BUT w...

We had a discussion about what needed to be done and you had mentioned that the progressRect would be transparent. In order for that to be transparent, we needed a background rectangle color. BUT we had talked this morning and I will remove this rectangle and just set the progress rect's color as w/e the active color is.

12:54 pm

vduong  (deleted user)

I believe this is leftover code that I missed from the slider bug fixes. I'll remove it for this branch.

I believe this is leftover code that I missed from the slider bug fixes. I'll remove it for this branch.

5:19 am

Behrouz NematiPour

Why was this Rectangle added? the ProgressRect is a Rectangle and can be used for the active color, and the _progressRectBackground seems redundant.

Why was this Rectangle added?
the ProgressRect is a Rectangle and can be used for the active color, and the _progressRectBackground seems redundant.

5:18 am

Behrouz NematiPour

Why was this property added?

Why was this property added?

4:45 am

Behrouz NematiPour

Regarding our new design change requests all tick marks shall be round by default.

Regarding our new design change requests all tick marks shall be round by default.

4:33 am

Behrouz NematiPour

Why In-Line Component is used. The idea behind the loader is to set them active if only it is set active. Does the in-line component have the same efficiency? Please test and provide proof of conce...

Why In-Line Component is used.
The idea behind the loader is to set them active if only it is set active.
Does the in-line component have the same efficiency?
Please test and provide proof of concept, since this feature is very new and I haven't tested it.
If can't be proven, use the loader only, please.

4:24 am

Behrouz NematiPour

In C++ the trinary "?" operator will call both true and false sections and then will decide which to return. If that is the case for the QML/JS I suggest using a function with an if block to return...

In C++ the trinary "?" operator will call both true and false sections and then will decide which to return.
If that is the case for the QML/JS I suggest using a function with an if block to return the decided object.
to ensure the trinary "?" operator behavior, you can use the "Component.onCompleted: {", if the new Qt 5.15 in-line Component declaration supports it.

Friday 10 Mar 2023
6:01 pm

Dara Navaei

UI-DEN-14909_UI VD S92 QS Arrows
UI-DEN-14909_UI VD S92 QS Arrows
6:01 pm

Dara Navaei

UI-DEN-14909_UI VD S92 QS Sliders
UI-DEN-14909_UI VD S92 QS Sliders