bootloader / firmware

include

Clone Tools

Stats

Commits this week: 0
Total Committers: 1
Last Commit: 21 Jan
Commits this week: 0

Lines of code count not available

Commit Activity

Commits By Day In Week
52 week commits volume
Commits By Day In Week
Commits by day
Commits By Day In Week
Commits by hour
Commits By Hour In Day
Commit calendar
 

Most active committers (90 days)

loading
loading
  • last updated a few seconds ago
All Commits Reviews
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
Wednesday 21 Jan
5:18 pm

Dara Navaei

LDT-3259 imported the code changes from LEAH-1415

Options
    • -2
    • +2
    ./sci.h
    • -4
    • +5
    ./sys_core.h
    • -1
    • +1
    ./sys_vim.h
  4. … 51 more files in changeset.
5:17 pm

Dara Navaei

LEAHI-BOOTLOADER-LDT-3259_Software Update - TD
LEAHI-BOOTLOADER-LDT-3259_Software Update - TD
Tuesday 20 Jan
2:40 pm

Sean Nash

TODO

TODO

2:39 pm

Sean Nash

TODO

TODO

2:39 pm

Sean Nash

TODO should be all caps.

TODO should be all caps.

2:39 pm

Sean Nash

TODO should be all caps for consistency (so we know what to search for).

TODO should be all caps for consistency (so we know what to search for).

2:38 pm

Sean Nash

I think it should be restored even if it's not used anywhere yet.

I think it should be restored even if it's not used anywhere yet.

2:34 pm

Sean Nash

Do we need an end of group marker down here?

Do we need an end of group marker down here?

2:34 pm

Sean Nash

Can you capture intent to resolve my comment in a TODO so we don't lose track of it? (General recommendation for all comments that we are postponing resolution for).

Can you capture intent to resolve my comment in a TODO so we don't lose track of it? (General recommendation for all comments that we are postponing resolution for).

2:31 pm

Sean Nash

Can we put test code inside of #ifdef TEST_CODE_ENABLED or something so that it is easy to remove later?

Can we put test code inside of #ifdef TEST_CODE_ENABLED or something so that it is easy to remove later?

Saturday 17 Jan
4:30 pm

Dara Navaei

It will be implemented in the new branch.

It will be implemented in the new branch.

4:30 pm

Dara Navaei

Done

Done

4:08 pm

Dara Navaei

Done

Done

3:59 pm

Dara Navaei

Done

Done

3:59 pm

Dara Navaei

Done

Done

3:58 pm

Dara Navaei

Removed the variable.

Removed the variable.

3:55 pm

Dara Navaei

Removed the TODO.

Removed the TODO.

3:55 pm

Dara Navaei

Removed the interrupt.

Removed the interrupt.

3:55 pm

Dara Navaei

Done

Done

3:36 pm

Dara Navaei

The new update request is checked on top of the mode update exec function. If there is a new update, it will request a transition otherwise, this is a terminal state.

The new update request is checked on top of the mode update exec function. If there is a new update, it will request a transition otherwise, this is a terminal state.

3:32 pm

Dara Navaei

It is the update mode re-initialized. The initialization is done using other functions that have their own doxygen comments. Do I need to add more here?

It is the update mode re-initialized. The initialization is done using other functions that have their own doxygen comments. Do I need to add more here?

3:30 pm

Dara Navaei

Added the return of a value.

Added the return of a value.

3:29 pm

Dara Navaei

Done

Done

3:28 pm

Dara Navaei

Done

Done

3:23 pm

Dara Navaei

Added the return.

Added the return.

3:07 pm

Dara Navaei

Done

Done

3:00 pm

Dara Navaei

I will implement the watchdog in the new branch.

I will implement the watchdog in the new branch.

2:59 pm

Dara Navaei

I will implement the watchdog in the new branch.

I will implement the watchdog in the new branch.

2:56 pm

Dara Navaei

Done

Done

2:49 pm

Dara Navaei

Done

Done