common

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few minutes ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
Fixed.

Fixed.

Fixed.

Fixed.

Why alarm if above low temp? I think >42 or > tgt+4 should be two ways to get same non-safety high temp alarm. And I think <33 or < tgt-4 should be two ways to get same non-safety low temp alarm. D...

Why alarm if above low temp? I think >42 or > tgt+4 should be two ways to get same non-safety high temp alarm.
And I think <33 or < tgt-4 should be two ways to get same non-safety low temp alarm.
Did Systems want to separate these? My understanding was not to separate.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

I believe this MSG_ID is being removed in another branch

I believe this MSG_ID is being removed in another branch

happens in FW common. This branch wasn't created at the start and our automated scripted ended up created its own code review. See: http://devapps.diality.us:8060/cru/DG-DEN-14689-2 Ill reorganize ...

happens in FW common. This branch wasn't created at the start and our automated scripted ended up created its own code review. See: http://devapps.diality.us:8060/cru/DG-DEN-14689-2
Ill reorganize the review naming shortly.

Should REQUEST be moved to end of name? Seems like there are many enum names where REQUEST is not at end of name.

Should REQUEST be moved to end of name? Seems like there are many enum names where REQUEST is not at end of name.

Is this a response to request above or a data broadcast?

Is this a response to request above or a data broadcast?

Should this have _REQUEST added to end?

Should this have _REQUEST added to end?

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

This will hard fault the HD. Please change to getTreatmentParameterU32()

This will hard fault the HD. Please change to getTreatmentParameterU32()

This will hard fault the HD. Please change to getTreatmentParameterU32()

This will hard fault the HD. Please change to getTreatmentParameterU32()

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

Default case sets status = FALSE. Setting to TRUE here is inconsistent with that.

Default case sets status = FALSE. Setting to TRUE here is inconsistent with that.

Remove old function call.

Remove old function call.

Let's review PRS req together. Seems like we have conflicting alarm properties in place that don't make sense to me. Let's figure out what behavior Systems team is looking for here and then decide ...

Let's review PRS req together. Seems like we have conflicting alarm properties in place that don't make sense to me. Let's figure out what behavior Systems team is looking for here and then decide what properties/persistence should be set.

PRS (Ex: PRS 377) no longer has it as of 1/05. SRS (Ex: SRSHD 901) does. which one should be enforced?

PRS (Ex: PRS 377) no longer has it as of 1/05. SRS (Ex: SRSHD 901) does. which one should be enforced?

I thought the non-safety temp alarms had a large persistence. Now they have none?

I thought the non-safety temp alarms had a large persistence. Now they have none?

If you clear immediately, it will let you resume/clear alarm immediately (before temp comes back into range), but then alarm will re-trigger immediately (because temp is still out of range).

If you clear immediately, it will let you resume/clear alarm immediately (before temp comes back into range), but then alarm will re-trigger immediately (because temp is still out of range).

I don't see DG changes using new ENUM names.

I don't see DG changes using new ENUM names.

Remove "endif" at end of comment?

Remove "endif" at end of comment?

What is this setting and why did it change?

What is this setting and why did it change?

extra CR/LF deleted; two statements on one line.

extra CR/LF deleted; two statements on one line.

Comment alignment (3x 147, 151, 157)

Comment alignment (3x 147, 151, 157)

//* ?

//* ?

//* ?

//* ?