Drivers

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few seconds ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
DEN-15166 added the Maxon drain pump RPM and the new non-isolated voltage

  1. … 8 more files in changeset.
DG-DEN-15166_Add Drain Pump Maxon Board RPM
DG-DEN-15166_Add Drain Pump Maxon Board RPM
Bamboo Commit: Updated the Copyright section and replaced tabs with 4 spaces

  1. … 8 more files in changeset.
RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

Fixed. Thanks!

Fixed. Thanks!

Fixed. Thanks!

Fixed. Thanks!

DEN-14689: sync msg_ids with msgdefs.h

  1. … 3 more files in changeset.
RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

I believe this MSG_ID is being removed in another branch

I believe this MSG_ID is being removed in another branch

happens in FW common. This branch wasn't created at the start and our automated scripted ended up created its own code review. See: http://devapps.diality.us:8060/cru/DG-DEN-14689-2 Ill reorganize ...

happens in FW common. This branch wasn't created at the start and our automated scripted ended up created its own code review. See: http://devapps.diality.us:8060/cru/DG-DEN-14689-2
Ill reorganize the review naming shortly.

Should REQUEST be moved to end of name? Seems like there are many enum names where REQUEST is not at end of name.

Should REQUEST be moved to end of name? Seems like there are many enum names where REQUEST is not at end of name.

Is this a response to request above or a data broadcast?

Is this a response to request above or a data broadcast?

Should this have _REQUEST added to end?

Should this have _REQUEST added to end?

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

I don't see DG changes using new ENUM names.

I don't see DG changes using new ENUM names.

Comment alignment (3x 147, 151, 157)

Comment alignment (3x 147, 151, 157)

//* ?

//* ?

//* ?

//* ?

//* ?

//* ?

//* ?

//* ?

DG-DEN-14689_Messaging Bugs_DGFW_and_Common
DG-DEN-14689_Messaging Bugs_DGFW_and_Common