Tasks

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few seconds ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
DEN-13598: Updates to FPGA clock speed check.

  1. … 2 more files in changeset.
RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

RESOLVED IN CODE WALKTHROUGH

Use 0.0F

Use 0.0F

Sensor misspelled (Sesnor). Change name to execFlowSensorMonitor.

Sensor misspelled (Sesnor). Change name to execFlowSensorMonitor.

DEN-13598 updated the code

DEN-13598 updated the code with the RAM alarms

  1. … 4 more files in changeset.
DEN-13598 Updated code for RAM error checking.

Line 1902 is the same check but reverses the order.

Line 1902 is the same check but reverses the order.

This code is un-commented.

This code is un-commented.

Done.

Done.

In in DEN-13834.

In in DEN-13834.

Done.

Done.

Added TODO to un-comment this line of code.

Added TODO to un-comment this line of code.

"FAPI_CHECK_FSM_READY_BUSY" is a macro.

"FAPI_CHECK_FSM_READY_BUSY" is a macro.

Done.

Done.

Done.

Done.

What is the value of SEMAPHORE_IN_USE_TIMEOUT_MS? The timeout appears to only be check when getSemaphore is called. Seems like you could acquire the semaphore and the process that acquired the sema...

What is the value of SEMAPHORE_IN_USE_TIMEOUT_MS? The timeout appears to only be check when getSemaphore is called. Seems like you could acquire the semaphore and the process that acquired the semaphore could hold onto it for a time much longer than SEMAPHORE_IN_USE_TIMEOUT.

Should this function handle invalid hex characters?

Should this function handle invalid hex characters?

Set "status" to FALSE.

Set "status" to FALSE.

Should this be removed?

Should this be removed?

Should variables in if be reversed?

Should variables in if be reversed?

Should this be in or not?

Should this be in or not?

Some values have "U"?

Some values have "U"?

Are we moving away from initializing via definition?

Are we moving away from initializing via definition?