hdfirmware

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few seconds ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
HD-DEN-16166_Event Message For Pass Fail Bld Self Test
HD-DEN-16166_Event Message For Pass Fail Bld Self Test
RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

Updated.

Updated.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

Fixed. Thanks!

Fixed. Thanks!

Need to do same for pump track latch.

Need to do same for pump track latch.

Remove this comment.

Remove this comment.

HD-DEN-15993_During Treatment Alarms 167 And Door And Latch Open Offer Resume Option That
HD-DEN-15993_During Treatment Alarms 167 And Door And Latch Open Offer Resume Option That
DEN-16102: changed dry self start state to always handle alarms with stop property.
DEN-16102: changed dry self start state to always handle alarms with stop property.
RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

Done.

Done.

Wouldn't we want to stop if an alarm occurred during recirculation, which affected the blood circuit? My inclination would be to manage which alarms were enabled in this state rather than not imple...

Wouldn't we want to stop if an alarm occurred during recirculation, which affected the blood circuit? My inclination would be to manage which alarms were enabled in this state rather than not implement the mechanism to stop the pumps.

Implementing the change.
Done.

Should blood recirc blocked be based on alarm properties (as you've written here) or based on whether user stopped (specifically)? My feeling is that since there is no blood in blood side of circui...

Should blood recirc blocked be based on alarm properties (as you've written here) or based on whether user stopped (specifically)? My feeling is that since there is no blood in blood side of circuit (because rinseback was completed before we got to recirc), the NoBloodRecirc alarm property maybe doesn't apply here and we should only stop BP if the user stop alarm is active.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

We already know dialysateRecircBlocked != TRUE here - should this just be a simple "else"?

We already know dialysateRecircBlocked != TRUE here - should this just be a simple "else"?

Done.

Done.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

Done.

Done.

This if condition appears to be redundant. rinsebackTimerCtr is set to zero in states where BP is running, so previous if condition would only be TRUE (rinsebackTimerCtr > 0) if BP not running.

This if condition appears to be redundant. rinsebackTimerCtr is set to zero in states where BP is running, so previous if condition would only be TRUE (rinsebackTimerCtr > 0) if BP not running.