Controllers

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few seconds ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
DENBUG-59: Addressed code review comments.

DENBUG-59: reverted vectorcast fixes.

  1. … 1 more file in changeset.
Fixed merge conflicts.

  1. … 3 more files in changeset.
Fixed merge conflicts.

  1. … 3 more files in changeset.
DENBUG-59: distinguish between alarms originating from outside.

  1. … 3 more files in changeset.
DENBUG-59: Addressed some unit test issues.

  1. … 1 more file in changeset.
DENBUG-59: Addressed some compiler warnings.

  1. … 3 more files in changeset.
RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

Updated.

Updated.

DEN-15993 Make same logic change for cartridge level (AlarmID 85)

Need to do same for pump track latch.

Need to do same for pump track latch.

DEN-15993 Correct resume handling for front door

HD-DEN-15993_During Treatment Alarms 167 And Door And Latch Open Offer Resume Option That
HD-DEN-15993_During Treatment Alarms 167 And Door And Latch Open Offer Resume Option That
DEN-15927-alarm-127-low-venous-pressure-triggers-post-treatment-1

Remove unnecessary define

DEN-15927-alarm-127-low-venous-pressure-triggers-post-treatment-1

Removed unnecessary define.

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/DEN-15927-alarm-127-low-venous-pressure-triggers-post-treatment-1' into develop

DEN-15927-alarm-127-low-venous-pressure-triggers-post-treatment-1

Incorporated state change, rather than flow.

DEN-15927-alarm-127-low-venous-pressure-triggers-post-treatment-1

Added a minimum flow requirement to provide a small additional margin to stabilize venous pressure.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

Wouldn't we want to stop if an alarm occurred during recirculation, which affected the blood circuit? My inclination would be to manage which alarms were enabled in this state rather than not imple...

Wouldn't we want to stop if an alarm occurred during recirculation, which affected the blood circuit? My inclination would be to manage which alarms were enabled in this state rather than not implement the mechanism to stop the pumps.

Implementing the change.
Done.

Should blood recirc blocked be based on alarm properties (as you've written here) or based on whether user stopped (specifically)? My feeling is that since there is no blood in blood side of circui...

Should blood recirc blocked be based on alarm properties (as you've written here) or based on whether user stopped (specifically)? My feeling is that since there is no blood in blood side of circuit (because rinseback was completed before we got to recirc), the NoBloodRecirc alarm property maybe doesn't apply here and we should only stop BP if the user stop alarm is active.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.