common

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few seconds ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
Could we move these fields outside of the for loop? They dont need to be initialized NUM_OF_FANS_NAMES times.

Could we move these fields outside of the for loop? They dont need to be initialized NUM_OF_FANS_NAMES times.

If the DG is broadcasting these raw values, shouldn't Dialin be sync'd as well to handle these new fields?

If the DG is broadcasting these raw values, shouldn't Dialin be sync'd as well to handle these new fields?

All the new timer counters no longer are initialized to 0. I understand that they get set in their respective init()'s to the timer counter, but was this intentional?

All the new timer counters no longer are initialized to 0. I understand that they get set in their respective init()'s to the timer counter, but was this intentional?

We should probably keep the = 0;

We should probably keep the = 0;

Most of the files are VectorCAST that has been brought back from Code Clinic. Look at the files but they are auto generated so they are mostly passing through.

Most of the files are VectorCAST that has been brought back from Code Clinic. Look at the files but they are auto generated so they are mostly passing through.

Notices the 170 files that need to be reviewed https://c.tenor.com/RXMxqsRKEn0AAAAC/this-is-fine.gif

Notices the 170 files that need to be reviewed

https://c.tenor.com/RXMxqsRKEn0AAAAC/this-is-fine.gif

DG-DEN-11750_DG Dev Dialysate Temperature Control Tune Up
DG-DEN-11750_DG Dev Dialysate Temperature Control Tune Up
RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

Please see comment below regarding the changes in common from this code review.

Please see comment below regarding the changes in common from this code review.

Dara and I have found out that this code review for common is misconfigured. The source and destination branches are misconfigured. The branch to review should have been from DEN-11980_sw_dev_sprin...

Dara and I have found out that this code review for common is misconfigured. The source and destination branches are misconfigured. The branch to review should have been from DEN-11980_sw_dev_sprint_64 and the "branch from" should have been from staging. This code review has staging as the branch to review with master as the "branch review."

Fixed. Thanks!

Fixed. Thanks!

Fixed. Thanks!

Fixed. Thanks!

Fixed. Thanks!

Fixed. Thanks!

Fixed. Thanks!

Fixed. Thanks!

Renamed to testSendCurrentTreatmentParameters(). thanks!

Renamed to testSendCurrentTreatmentParameters(). thanks!