fwcommon

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few seconds ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
Bamboo Commit: Updated the Copyright section and replaced tabs with 4 spaces

  1. … 7 more files in changeset.
Merged release/p1_staging

Bamboo Commit: Updated the Copyright section and replaced tabs with 4 spaces

Merged DEN-16499

DENBUG-162 latest from staging

DEN-16499 added doxygen comments to the structures. Updated the messages for the messages list script

DG-DEN-16499_FW Message List Testing Issues 2
DG-DEN-16499_FW Message List Testing Issues 2
HD Staging Unreviewed Commits
HD Staging Unreviewed Commits
Bamboo Commit: Updated the Copyright section and replaced tabs with 4 spaces

Merged DEN-16499

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

RESOLVED in CODE WALKTHROUGH.

Fixed the code.

Fixed the code.

This looks wrong.

This looks wrong.

DG-DEN-16499_FW Message List Testing Issues
DG-DEN-16499_FW Message List Testing Issues
DEN-16499 added doxygen comments

DEN-16499 removed the name from the typedef structs for doxygen

Merge branch 'staging' into DEN-16499-fw-message-list-testing-issues

Bamboo Commit: Updated the Copyright section and replaced tabs with 4 spaces

  1. … 7 more files in changeset.
Is bootloader going to use fwcommon code? Is #ifdef #else backwards?

Is bootloader going to use fwcommon code? Is #ifdef #else backwards?

Needed?

Needed?

This is not user code. Next regen will restore this code. Do we really need to disable ECC test code?

This is not user code. Next regen will restore this code. Do we really need to disable ECC test code?

This is not user code. Next regen will restore this code. Do we really need to remove this code?

This is not user code. Next regen will restore this code. Do we really need to remove this code?

What is this code doing? Why no comments? Is it necessary?

What is this code doing? Why no comments? Is it necessary?