Bubbles.c

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few seconds ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
Updated

Updated

Added

Added

If you change this line to "if ( ++airPumpStallCounter >= AIR_PUMP_STALL_PERSISTENCE )", you can remove the if statement above.

If you change this line to "if ( ++airPumpStallCounter >= AIR_PUMP_STALL_PERSISTENCE )", you can remove the if statement above.

I was thinking that comment should go above the first if statement.

I was thinking that comment should go above the first if statement.

Updated

Updated

Define what 3 means (#define up top). If 3 means 3 x 50ms general task interval, define it as shown below: #define AIR_PUMP_STALL_PERSISTENCE ( 150 / TASK_GENERAL_INTERVAL ) ///< How long stall con...

Define what 3 means (#define up top). If 3 means 3 x 50ms general task interval, define it as shown below:
#define AIR_PUMP_STALL_PERSISTENCE ( 150 / TASK_GENERAL_INTERVAL ) ///< How long stall condition must persist before alarming.

OR use persistent alarm.

Added

Added

Add a comment explaining what we're looking for here (i.e. we are commanding air pump to run but zero measured pump speed indicates it is not running).

Add a comment explaining what we're looking for here (i.e. we are commanding air pump to run but zero measured pump speed indicates it is not running).

Added

Added

Should probably initialize your new stall counter variable.

Should probably initialize your new stall counter variable.

Sean Nash I need your help for writing this Alarm properties.

Sean Nash I need your help for writing this Alarm properties.

Can we remove the empty lines after if / else if blocks in this function?

Can we remove the empty lines after if / else if blocks in this function?

LEAHI-TD-FIRMWARE-LDT-3600_Request for TD Test Config for Testing without Tubing Set on TD
LEAHI-TD-FIRMWARE-LDT-3600_Request for TD Test Config for Testing without Tubing Set on TD
Updated

Updated

But now it's not in right position (in this table only). This table should be sorted by rank.

But now it's not in right position (in this table only). This table should be sorted by rank.

Updated

Updated

Updated

Updated

This was correct before (assuming 711 was correct rank).

This was correct before (assuming 711 was correct rank).

Why change rank back to 206? If priority is low, rank was probably correct at 711. I think you had correct properties before - it was just in the wrong row.

Why change rank back to 206? If priority is low, rank was probably correct at 711. I think you had correct properties before - it was just in the wrong row.

Updated

Updated

Updated

Updated

This alarm does not belong here. Put it back where it was before. In the next table below, the alarms are sorted by rank. But this property table is sorted by alarm ID #.

This alarm does not belong here. Put it back where it was before.
In the next table below, the alarms are sorted by rank. But this property table is sorted by alarm ID #.

Why did you move it. The alarm is #30 so it should stay here where you had it before.

Why did you move it. The alarm is #30 so it should stay here where you had it before.