yeah its obsolete. This is an old branch that recently got synced with latest staging. It looks like the CR doesn't recognize the correct changes from staging. There should only be 1 file change ( conductivity sensors ).

Putting the aliases at the end makes them grouped up and in my opinion makes easier reading of the enum.

Why move this here? Seems like an odd placement so far away from D14.

Merged FP into DD test configs

Renamed

Fixed

Added enum to FP and TD Configs.

Vinayakam Mani What is the advantage of doing that?
If I go with Beta_1_9_HW, I will need to rename the flag when we start using Beta 2+. And rename it in all the scripts in different repository when starting with 2.0.
While I use a more generic flag, I won't need to do that. So just using a better name I am sparing myself hours of work in the future.

You may use the same test configs from DD here, to set the relevant test configs from FP Dialin.

POS_FIELD_3??

Please follow the same naming convention as firmware enums.

Understand. In this case, the spare positions correspond to bit positions in the FPGA register and the new valves took the 1, 2, and 6 spots.

Fixed Typo

Ok
(But feels weird to start the counting of existing items from 0 if that's the spare3 instead of 1. Calling the D79 the "zeroeth" spare valve instead of the first spare valve... Personally I think we should name them Spare1-8 instead of Spare 0-7)

In f/w, the spares are numbered 3, 4, 5, and 7 (not 1..4).

interval?

Updated according to changes of LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-2998-1

Match with the firmware in LDT-2998.