DDInterface.c

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few minutes ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
I think DD (and TD) want mL/min and UI wants L/hr. TxParams should have already calculated this rate (in mL/min) and should probably have a get function you can call from here to access it. When se...

I think DD (and TD) want mL/min and UI wants L/hr. TxParams should have already calculated this rate (in mL/min) and should probably have a get function you can call from here to access it. When sending UF rate to UI, we would convert back to L/hr first, but everywhere else we would work with mL/min.

Remove extra blank line.

Remove extra blank line.

Remove extra space before function name.

Remove extra space before function name.

This is not a Dialin message, so move up above all of these "test" functions.

This is not a Dialin message, so move up above all of these "test" functions.

Why is this in TDCommon? It should probably be in MessagePayloads.h or DDDefs.h so both DD and TD f/w can share this payload structure. And the common definitions should be added to appropriate dox...

Why is this in TDCommon? It should probably be in MessagePayloads.h or DDDefs.h so both DD and TD f/w can share this payload structure. And the common definitions should be added to appropriate doxygen group.

As the fw haven't requested the gen dialysate it is expected to be in pre-gen mode

As the fw haven't requested the gen dialysate it is expected to be in pre-gen mode

Do we have a return confirmation that the command is accepted by DD?

Do we have a return confirmation that the command is accepted by DD?

Is the UF rate unit in ml/min (instead of hr.)?

Is the UF rate unit in ml/min (instead of hr.)?

Are we assuming the sub mode return is pre-gen sub mode always?

Are we assuming the sub mode return is pre-gen sub mode always?

create the getDialGoodToDeliverStatus() function and have that return true rather than have the assignment here

create the getDialGoodToDeliverStatus() function and have that return true rather than have the assignment here

comment still needed?

comment still needed?

LEAHI-TD-FIRMWARE-LDT-4188_SW/FW integration to run a Treatment from UI
LEAHI-TD-FIRMWARE-LDT-4188_SW/FW integration to run a Treatment from UI
???

???

Do we need a parameter for confirmation?

Do we need a parameter for confirmation?

Added to be consistent. Once institutional records are implemented will store it in there instead of a macro

Added to be consistent. Once institutional records are implemented will store it in there instead of a macro

DO we need bicarb conversion factor as well?

DO we need bicarb conversion factor as well?

preweight can be non-zero

preweight can be non-zero

Add blank line after declarations.

Add blank line after declarations.

From what I see in UI, it is just a range value not an enum/index

From what I see in UI, it is just a range value not an enum/index

Is it an enum/index like Denali then?

Is it an enum/index like Denali then?

No we are not getting conv factor from UI on it I will have to confirm with Nick to see if we will get the bicarbConvFactor

No we are not getting conv factor from UI on it
I will have to confirm with Nick to see if we will get the bicarbConvFactor

Align comments.

Align comments.

Can we just remove this?

Can we just remove this?

Can we just remove this?

Can we just remove this?