StateFlushPermeate.c

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few minutes ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
instead of 0, we can use the level Enum 'LVL_STATE_EMPTY'?

instead of 0, we can use the level Enum 'LVL_STATE_EMPTY'?

lower? and change the D98 level sensor comment as well.

lower? and change the D98 level sensor comment as well.

Remove empty line

Remove empty line

Space before LVL_STATE_LOW

Space before LVL_STATE_LOW

space inside array index.

space inside array index.

Space inside parenthesis.

Space inside parenthesis.

Change this to LEVEL_T enum.

Change this to LEVEL_T enum.

Is this macro still being used? if not, delete it.

Is this macro still being used? if not, delete it.

LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-3978_Switch Chamber F conductive level sensors to broadcast 1 as sensing liquid
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-3978_Switch Chamber F conductive level sensors to broadcast 1 as sensing liquid
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-3218_Update IOFP permeate target flow rate to 800 mL/min (and flow control as needed)
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-3218_Update IOFP permeate target flow rate to 800 mL/min (and flow control as needed)
Updated

Updated

Added

Added

Updated

Updated

Fixed

Fixed

TRUE if low flow alarm is exempt, FALSE if not.

TRUE if low flow alarm is exempt, FALSE if not.

timeSinceP12Started?

timeSinceP12Started?

Should we have a comment for this one too?

Should we have a comment for this one too?

Should we rename this function to "isROPumpLowflowAlarmExempt"? The current name makes me think it will set the alarm to be exempt.

Should we rename this function to "isROPumpLowflowAlarmExempt"? The current name makes me think it will set the alarm to be exempt.

Updated to use isPersistentAlarmTriggered

Updated to use isPersistentAlarmTriggered

Fixed

Fixed