td-firmware / firmware / App

Monitors

Clone Tools

Stats

Commits this week: 10
Total Committers: 7
Last Commit: 12 Mar
Commits this week: 10

Lines of code count not available

Commit Activity

Commits By Day In Week
52 week commits volume
Commits By Day In Week
Commits by day
Commits By Day In Week
Commits by hour
Commits By Hour In Day
Commit calendar
 

Most active committers (90 days)

loading
loading
  • last updated a few seconds ago
All Commits Reviews
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
Thursday 12 Mar
4:08 pm

Sean Nash

Wednesday 11 Mar
3:31 pm

Dara Navaei

LEAHI-TD-FIRMWARE-LDT-3600_Request for TD Test Config for Testing without Tubing Set on TD
LEAHI-TD-FIRMWARE-LDT-3600_Request for TD Test Config for Testing without Tubing Set on TD
Tuesday 10 Mar
2:25 pm

Vendor - TEL - Varshini Nagabooshanam

1:52 pm

Vendor - TEL - Jashwant Gantyada and Sean Nash

Friday 06 Mar
2:02 pm

Vendor - TEL - Varshini Nagabooshanam

Removed

Removed

1:56 pm

Sean Nash

I don't think we need to call setPressureLimitsToOuterBounds() either. The signal function will indirectly cause that function to be called later.

I don't think we need to call setPressureLimitsToOuterBounds() either. The signal function will indirectly cause that function to be called later.

11:41 am

Vendor - TEL - Varshini Nagabooshanam

Updated

Updated

9:55 am

Sean Nash

I think we should just call signalInitiatePressureStabilization( USE_NORMAL_STABILIZATION_PERIOD );

I think we should just call signalInitiatePressureStabilization( USE_NORMAL_STABILIZATION_PERIOD );

9:50 am

Sean Nash

Thursday 05 Mar
3:47 pm

Dara Navaei

LEAHI-TD-FIRMWARE-LDT-1415_Pressures Monitoring - TD
LEAHI-TD-FIRMWARE-LDT-1415_Pressures Monitoring - TD
1:16 pm

Sean Nash

Wednesday 04 Mar
9:40 am

Vendor - TEL - Varshini Nagabooshanam

Updated

Updated

Wednesday 25 Feb
9:19 am

Sean Nash

Friday 20 Feb
1:48 pm

Sean Nash

1:45 pm

Sean Nash

This is a msg payload structure. Even though all fields are 4 bytes, we should still pack it in case we add smaller fields later.

This is a msg payload structure. Even though all fields are 4 bytes, we should still pack it in case we add smaller fields later.

1:42 pm

Raghu Kallala

Updated

Updated

1:36 pm

Raghu Kallala

Updated

Updated

1:35 pm

Sean Nash

I think this function should be in ModeTreatment or Messaging.

I think this function should be in ModeTreatment or Messaging.

1:34 pm

Sean Nash

update params in header.

update params in header.

1:34 pm

Raghu Kallala

you are right, I missed it here. Fixed.

you are right, I missed it here.
Fixed.

1:33 pm

Sean Nash

Move pop to be right after last structure to be packed.

Move pop to be right after last structure to be packed.

1:28 pm

Sean Nash

I thought acid fields were F32?

I thought acid fields were F32?

1:08 pm

Vendor - TEL - Varshini Nagabooshanam

Updated

Updated

1:02 pm

Sean Nash

But now it's not in right position (in this table only). This table should be sorted by rank.

But now it's not in right position (in this table only). This table should be sorted by rank.

12:41 pm

Raghu Kallala

removed both enums

removed both enums

12:13 pm

Vendor - TEL - Varshini Nagabooshanam

Updated

Updated

12:12 pm

Vendor - TEL - Varshini Nagabooshanam

Updated

Updated

11:37 am

Sean Nash

This was correct before (assuming 711 was correct rank).

This was correct before (assuming 711 was correct rank).

11:36 am

Sean Nash

Why change rank back to 206? If priority is low, rank was probably correct at 711. I think you had correct properties before - it was just in the wrong row.

Why change rank back to 206? If priority is low, rank was probably correct at 711. I think you had correct properties before - it was just in the wrong row.

11:26 am

Raghu Kallala

Updated

Updated