td-firmware / firmware / App

Monitors

Clone Tools

Stats

Commits this week: 10
Total Committers: 9
Last Commit: 03 Aug
Commits this week: 10

Lines of code count not available

Commit Activity

Commits By Day In Week
52 week commits volume
Commits By Day In Week
Commits by day
Commits By Day In Week
Commits by hour
Commits By Hour In Day
Commit calendar
 

Most active committers (90 days)

loading
loading
  • last updated a few seconds ago
All Commits Reviews
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
Today
6 hrs ago

Sean Nash

I thought Eliza said they wanted to do blood sitting timer even if blood was rinsed back (still a little blood in line).

I thought Eliza said they wanted to do blood sitting timer even if blood was rinsed back (still a little blood in line).

7 hrs ago

Vendor - TEL - Suresh Dharnala

Wednesday 05 Aug
8:57 pm

Sean Nash

4:54 pm

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava and Sean Nash

4:11 pm

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

Why are we changing the rank of an existing alarm?

Why are we changing the rank of an existing alarm?

3:58 pm

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

These new functions should be above the test functions. Please align with the Messaging.c file. It looks correct in the Messaging.c file.

These new functions should be above the test functions.

Please align with the Messaging.c file.
It looks correct in the Messaging.c file.

3:54 pm

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

Move this above the test functions.

Move this above the test functions.

3:45 pm

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

What is the use case of this header include?

What is the use case of this header include?

2:47 pm

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

add space in [ ]

add space in [ ]

2:41 pm

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

align comments

align comments

2:38 pm

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

Should these three alarms be moved after alarm 852? It looks like 999 is currently placed before 852.

Should these three alarms be moved after alarm 852?

It looks like 999 is currently placed before 852.

2:10 pm

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

break this line

break this line

2:09 pm

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

Add @message id MSG_ID_TD_UI_GENERIC_CONFIRMATION_REQUEST

Add @message id MSG_ID_TD_UI_GENERIC_CONFIRMATION_REQUEST

2:08 pm

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

break this line

break this line

2:08 pm

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

break this line

break this line

1:58 pm

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

Update function name: handleRinsebackAdditionalState

Update function name: handleRinsebackAdditionalState

1:49 pm

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

Thank you for clarifying!

Thank you for clarifying!

1:47 pm

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

Thank you for clarifying!

Thank you for clarifying!

1:43 pm

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

Add cumulativeBloodPrimeVolume_mL to ouputs. Optional: While you are updating, can you please also add bloodPrimeRampFlowRate_mL_min and bloodPrimeState to the inputs?

Add cumulativeBloodPrimeVolume_mL to ouputs.

Optional: While you are updating, can you please also add bloodPrimeRampFlowRate_mL_min and bloodPrimeState to the inputs?

1:35 pm

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

Add recircAllowed to outputs.

Add recircAllowed to outputs.

1:25 pm

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

Thank you for clarifying!

Thank you for clarifying!

12:45 pm

Sean Nash

What if we're in paused state (because your alarm has stop property set)? Should we return TRUE here if in paused state and interrupted state was the await syringe load confirmation state?

What if we're in paused state (because your alarm has stop property set)? Should we return TRUE here if in paused state and interrupted state was the await syringe load confirmation state?

12:40 pm

Sean Nash

Right now, the load syringe alarm indicates stop so we will go to paused state. Is that what we want to do? Don't we want to stay in this state and wait for confirmation?

Right now, the load syringe alarm indicates stop so we will go to paused state. Is that what we want to do? Don't we want to stay in this state and wait for confirmation?

12:37 pm

Sean Nash

Should this alarm have stop property set to FALSE?

Should this alarm have stop property set to FALSE?

Tuesday 04 Aug
1:14 pm

Vendor - TEL - Praneeth Bunne

initialized using resetRinsebackFlags()

initialized using resetRinsebackFlags()

1:03 pm

Vendor - TEL - Praneeth Bunne

those are initialized in resetTreatmentRecircFlags() and that is called in init

those are initialized in resetTreatmentRecircFlags() and that is called in init

11:16 am

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

align comment

align comment

10:52 am

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

use FALSE

use FALSE

10:52 am

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

use FALSE

use FALSE

10:39 am

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

It looks like the rows may be misaligned with the alarm ID declarations. For example, ALARM_ID_TD_BATTERY_CHARGER_ERROR_DETECTED is declared as 204.

It looks like the rows may be misaligned with the alarm ID declarations.
For example, ALARM_ID_TD_BATTERY_CHARGER_ERROR_DETECTED is declared as 204.