Ultrafiltration.c

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few minutes ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
Is this normal UF volume or normal UF volume + Iso UF Volume?

Is this normal UF volume or normal UF volume + Iso UF Volume?

Consider moving this validity check into the setTDRequestedGenDState function. And what should we do if it's not valid?

Consider moving this validity check into the setTDRequestedGenDState function.
And what should we do if it's not valid?

Why only these states are valid?

Why only these states are valid?

Remove list of states from comment. It is not a complete list and we shouldn't even try to list them here anyway.

Remove list of states from comment. It is not a complete list and we shouldn't even try to list them here anyway.

comments start's with uppercase?

comments start's with uppercase?

comment starts with capital letter?

comment starts with capital letter?

do we have to leave a blank line after this?

do we have to leave a blank line after this?

LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-4011_Isolated UF (DD) - FW Implementation - 1/2:
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-4011_Isolated UF (DD) - FW Implementation - 1/2:
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-4011_Isolated UF (DD) - FW Implementation - 1/2:
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-4011_Isolated UF (DD) - FW Implementation - 1/2:
Done.

Done.

Done.

Done.

Use ternary to explicitly assign TRUE or FALSE.

Use ternary to explicitly assign TRUE or FALSE.

Use ternary to explicitly assign TRUE or FALSE.

Use ternary to explicitly assign TRUE or FALSE.

Done.

Done.

I think we also need this to be uncommented, as we were running into an alarm because of this.

I think we also need this to be uncommented, as we were running into an alarm because of this.

Added new field for d1 filtered temperature and restored the pressure sensor temperature.

Added new field for d1 filtered temperature and restored the pressure sensor temperature.

The latest code from staging has an update and fixes this comment. It's not showing here, since the file was already reviewed.

The latest code from staging has an update and fixes this comment. It's not showing here, since the file was already reviewed.

as discussed, these were outcome of the test results. we will review these gains with latest controller.

as discussed, these were outcome of the test results. we will review these gains with latest controller.

Done.

Done.

Done.

Done.

Should we set this flag to FALSE at top of loop?

Should we set this flag to FALSE at top of loop?

Should we just set this flag to FALSE at top of loop?

Should we just set this flag to FALSE at top of loop?

These P being so much bigger than I are going to be very volatile (lots of big ups and downs). I think these should all be primarily I with much smaller P coefficients.

These P being so much bigger than I are going to be very volatile (lots of big ups and downs). I think these should all be primarily I with much smaller P coefficients.

Update comment.

Update comment.

Is this eventually going to be d1Temp?

Is this eventually going to be d1Temp?

LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-3958_Dialysate Temperature - FW Implementation - 2/2:
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-3958_Dialysate Temperature - FW Implementation - 2/2:
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-4246_FW Support for UI Demo
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-4246_FW Support for UI Demo