Clone Tools
  • last updated a few seconds ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
references to Denali has been removed

references to Denali has been removed

fix

  1. … 1 more file in changeset.
Removed Denali reference

  1. … 75 more files in changeset.
Shouldn't we use Leahi instead of Denali?

Shouldn't we use Leahi instead of Denali?

Added missing data for conversion

  1. … 2 more files in changeset.
Rewrote event sbmode change handling

  1. … 1 more file in changeset.
- Updated Event enum - Updated Datatypes enum - Added some debugging print to abstract class - Removed some init import to remove cyclic dependencies - Updated alarms

  1. … 13 more files in changeset.
- Updated events

  1. … 3 more files in changeset.
- Updated DD and TD module - Updaterd TDValvePosition enum

  1. … 54 more files in changeset.
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3904_[OpMode] The operation mode broadcasts does not return the 3rd and 4th level modes
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3904_[OpMode] The operation mode broadcasts does not return the 3rd and 4th level modes
- DD refactor Changes in FP and TD module

  1. … 32 more files in changeset.
removed

removed

Remove this extra line

Remove this extra line

- Moved enum def class to proxy file - Added comments to module files - Removed test config TEST_CONFIG_DD_DRY_BICART_TEST

  1. … 60 more files in changeset.
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3557_[Documantation][Enhancement] Add documentation header to dialin variables
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3557_[Documantation][Enhancement] Add documentation header to dialin variables
We agreed to change back the enums into the static variation. Why would that cover a class that has been implemented to mask the enums from direct access, so if they need to be changed to dynamic o...

We agreed to change back the enums into the static variation.
Why would that cover a class that has been implemented to mask the enums from direct access, so if they need to be changed to dynamic or renamed or anything, the other repositories that are using them through this class won't be affected or need any update.

Did we not decide to revert all the changes back and the redesign the whole concept again?

Did we not decide to revert all the changes back and the redesign the whole concept again?

Look in the td_defs.py for the same comment.

Look in the td_defs.py for the same comment.

Look in the td_defs.py for the same comment.

Look in the td_defs.py for the same comment.

Look in the td_defs.py for the same comment.

Look in the td_defs.py for the same comment.

Look in the td_defs.py for the same comment.

Look in the td_defs.py for the same comment.