LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-2998 LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-2998

4:51 pm

Vendor - TEL - Varshini Nagabooshanam and Sean Nash

More
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-2998-1
finished reviewing

3:18 pm

Michael Garthwaite

More
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-2998-1
resumed reviewing

10:33 am

Zoltan Miskolci

Merged FP into DD test configs

10:33 am

Zoltan Miskolci

Added enum to FP and TD Configs.

9:28 am

Vinayakam Mani What is the advantage of doing that? If I go with Beta_1_9_HW, I will need to rename the flag when we start using Beta 2+. And rename it in all the scripts in different repository wh...

Vinayakam Mani What is the advantage of doing that?
If I go with Beta_1_9_HW, I will need to rename the flag when we start using Beta 2+. And rename it in all the scripts in different repository when starting with 2.0.
While I use a more generic flag, I won't need to do that. So just using a better name I am sparing myself hours of work in the future.

11:47 am

Vinayakam Mani

More
Re: LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-2998-1
commented on review

You may use the same test configs from DD here, to set the relevant test configs from FP Dialin.

11:35 am

Vinayakam Mani

More
Re: LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-2998-1
commented on review

POS_FIELD_3??

11:34 am

Vinayakam Mani

More
Re: LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-2998-1
commented on review

Please follow the same naming convention as firmware enums.

11:02 am

Sean Nash

Understand. In this case, the spare positions correspond to bit positions in the FPGA register and the new valves took the 1, 2, and 6 spots.

11:01 am

Zoltan Miskolci

Fixed Typo

10:57 am

Zoltan Miskolci

Ok (But feels weird to start the counting of existing items from 0 if that's the spare3 instead of 1. Calling the D79 the "zeroeth" spare valve instead of the first spare valve... Personally I thin...

Ok
(But feels weird to start the counting of existing items from 0 if that's the spare3 instead of 1. Calling the D79 the "zeroeth" spare valve instead of the first spare valve... Personally I think we should name them Spare1-8 instead of Spare 0-7)

10:23 am