leahi-fwcommon

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few seconds ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
LDT-5409 july demo changes for priming

removed header

updated

updated

updated

updated

updated.

updated.

updated

updated

removed.

removed.

align comment

align comment

LDT-3975: code review comments

Merge branch 'LDT-3975-water-treatment-and-degassing--' into develop

When we send any message to UI, usually add the message id in the doxygen header like this. @details \b Message \b Sent: MSG_ID_TD_RESP_TREATMENT_PARAMS_TO_VALIDATE Please refer to the function s...

When we send any message to UI, usually add the message id in the doxygen header like this.

@details \b Message \b Sent: MSG_ID_TD_RESP_TREATMENT_PARAMS_TO_VALIDATE

Please refer to the function sendTreatmentParamsResponse()

When we send any message to UI, usually add the message id in the doxygen header like this. *@details \b Message \b Sent: MSG_ID_TD_RESP_TREATMENT_PARAMS_TO_VALIDATE Please refer to the functi...

When we send any message to UI, usually add the message id in the doxygen header like this.

  • @details \b Message \b Sent: MSG_ID_TD_RESP_TREATMENT_PARAMS_TO_VALIDATE


Please refer to the function sendTreatmentParamsResponse()

When we send any message to UI, usually add the message id in the doxygen header like this. *@details \b Message \b Sent: MSG_ID_TD_RESP_TREATMENT_PARAMS_TO_VALIDATE Please refer to the functi...

When we send any message to UI, usually add the message id in the doxygen header like this.

  • @details \b Message \b Sent: MSG_ID_TD_RESP_TREATMENT_PARAMS_TO_VALIDATE


Please refer to the function sendTreatmentParamsResponse()

It looks like the rows may be misaligned with the alarm ID declarations. For example, ALARM_ID_TD_SAFETY_SHUTDOWN_POST_TEST_FAILED is declared as 207.

It looks like the rows may be misaligned with the alarm ID declarations.
For example, ALARM_ID_TD_SAFETY_SHUTDOWN_POST_TEST_FAILED is declared as 207.

Should Instructions part be this? A problem was detected with the hemodialysis device.

Should Instructions part be this?

A problem was detected with the hemodialysis device.

Please confirm if the source is DD?

Please confirm if the source is DD?

Merge branch 'staging' into LDT-3975-water-treatment-and-degassing--

LDT-4063: fixed merge conflicts

LDT-4063: Addressed review comments

LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-4873_(Request) Add config to disable conductive level sensor fault
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-4873_(Request) Add config to disable conductive level sensor fault
What is the use case of including this header?

What is the use case of including this header?

What is the use case of including this header?

What is the use case of including this header?

Should we move this up before the test functions?

Should we move this up before the test functions?

Add @messages MSG_ID_TD_POST_FINAL_TEST_RESULT

Add @messages MSG_ID_TD_POST_FINAL_TEST_RESULT

Add @messages MSG_ID_TD_POST_SINGLE_TEST_RESULT

Add @messages MSG_ID_TD_POST_SINGLE_TEST_RESULT

is the function description correct? change DG -> DD

is the function description correct?
change DG -> DD

output is none

output is none

add safetyShutdownSelfTestStatus to outputs

add safetyShutdownSelfTestStatus to outputs

why is this line commented out? Should we remove it or add a TODO?

why is this line commented out? Should we remove it or add a TODO?

Remove blank line

Remove blank line