Clone Tools
  • last updated a few minutes ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
Bamboo Commit: Updated the Copyright section and replaced tabs with 4 spaces

  1. … 28 more files in changeset.
Bamboo Commit: Updated the Copyright section and replaced tabs with 4 spaces

  1. … 28 more files in changeset.
Bamboo Commit: Updated the Copyright section and replaced tabs with 4 spaces

  1. … 28 more files in changeset.
Done.

Done.

Why the extra leading zeroes? If you want to ensure the literal is treated like a U32, you can do 0x00000001 or simply 1U, but I suspect the compiler will default to 32 bits anyway.

Why the extra leading zeroes? If you want to ensure the literal is treated like a U32, you can do 0x00000001 or simply 1U, but I suspect the compiler will default to 32 bits anyway.

I believe baro is being moved to the TD firmware. DD will have to get baro readings from TD broadcasts.

I believe baro is being moved to the TD firmware. DD will have to get baro readings from TD broadcasts.

Do you want to add a space for the baro pressure sensor from which we receive from the TD?

Do you want to add a space for the baro pressure sensor from which we receive from the TD?

LDT-2198: Updated FPGA driver for DD.

I have removed multiple M4 valve control across in DD. IO/FP will govern the M4 valve control.

I have removed multiple M4 valve control across in DD. IO/FP will govern the M4 valve control.

LDT-2198 conductivity code changes

fixed. thanks

fixed. thanks

fixed. thanks

fixed. thanks

fixed. thanks

fixed. thanks

fixed. removed m4 from dd side

fixed. removed m4 from dd side

Align comments.

Align comments.

Is it FP software fault, instead of TD fault?

Is it FP software fault, instead of TD fault?

Michael Garthwaite: Can we remove the M4 valve controls (across) in DD and keep it only as part of the IO/FP? So that the M4 valve actuation is done by one entity.

Michael Garthwaite: Can we remove the M4 valve controls (across) in DD and keep it only as part of the IO/FP? So that the M4 valve actuation is done by one entity.

Removed FMI support for Beta. will maintain FMI support only in Alpha

Removed FMI support for Beta. will maintain FMI support only in Alpha

Align "="

Align "="

Are we still supporting FMI pumps?

Are we still supporting FMI pumps?

renamed to readFloaterLevelstatus()

renamed to readFloaterLevelstatus()

fixed. thanks

fixed. thanks

fixed. thanks

fixed. thanks

fixed. thanks

fixed. thanks

Consider making function name a little clearer that we are getting the status from the FPGA.

Consider making function name a little clearer that we are getting the status from the FPGA.

Add blank line before return statement.

Add blank line before return statement.

Read FPGA P25 status once at top of P25 if statement into a local var and use that in these if conditions so you don't have to keep calling the fpga function.

Read FPGA P25 status once at top of P25 if statement into a local var and use that in these if conditions so you don't have to keep calling the fpga function.

Read FPGA D6 status once at top of D6 if statement into a local var and use that in these if conditions so you don't have to keep calling the fpga function.

Read FPGA D6 status once at top of D6 if statement into a local var and use that in these if conditions so you don't have to keep calling the fpga function.