dd-firmware / firmware

source

Clone Tools

Stats

Commits this week: 0
Total Committers: 8
Last Commit: 11:15
Commits this week: 0

Lines of code count not available

Commit Activity

Commits By Day In Week
52 week commits volume
Commits By Day In Week
Commits by day
Commits By Day In Week
Commits by hour
Commits By Hour In Day
Commit calendar
 

Most active committers (90 days)

loading
loading
  • last updated a few seconds ago
All Commits Reviews
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
Today
4 hrs ago

Dara Navaei

LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
Friday 13 Feb
9:40 am

Vinayakam Mani

Tuesday 10 Feb
1:32 pm

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil and Sean Nash

10:50 am

Sean Nash

Add TODO to comment.

Add TODO to comment.

10:48 am

Sean Nash

Put () around the 2 conditions

Put () around the 2 conditions

Friday 06 Feb
7:35 pm

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil

Fixed it

Fixed it

7:34 pm

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil

Ya , I forgot the coding guide line . Fixed it

Ya , I forgot the coding guide line .
Fixed it

7:34 pm

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil

fixed it

fixed it

7:34 pm

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil

Fixed it

Fixed it

7:32 pm

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil

fixed it

fixed it

3:56 pm

Sean Nash

2:22 pm

Sean Nash

Use explicit BOOL conditions (e.g. TRUE == isFreshDialysatePressureInRange).

Use explicit BOOL conditions (e.g. TRUE == isFreshDialysatePressureInRange).

10:52 am

Sean Nash

I prefer to be explicit on BOOL conditions like this (e.g. TRUE == isFreshDialysatePressureInRange).

I prefer to be explicit on BOOL conditions like this (e.g. TRUE == isFreshDialysatePressureInRange).

10:51 am

Sean Nash

Remove extra blank line.

Remove extra blank line.

9:26 am

Vinayakam Mani

I don't think we need to check test config for variable initialization.

I don't think we need to check test config for variable initialization.

9:13 am

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil

fixed it

fixed it

9:10 am

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil

Fixed it

Fixed it

9:04 am

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil

fixed it

fixed it

9:04 am

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil

fixed it

fixed it

9:03 am

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil

fixed it

fixed it

9:03 am

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil

fixed it

fixed it

9:01 am

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil

fixed it

fixed it

Thursday 05 Feb
7:27 pm

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil

Since fill and drain is a single time request and it is not a frequent request similar to supply during dialysate generation. I removed and now run as idle

Since fill and drain is a single time request and it is not a frequent request similar to supply during dialysate generation. I removed and now run as idle

7:24 pm

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil

To make it exclusive operation. no previous request should be pending when a new operation is requested. So only one state machine is running at a time. otherwise, while chamber fill is in progress...

To make it exclusive operation. no previous request should be pending when a new operation is requested. So only one state machine is running at a time. otherwise, while chamber fill is in progress, anyone can request drain and both requests will be handled. even through new code run only one state machine at a time, this will ensure that only one request is submitted to drybicart

This was a concern reported by Sean and proposed for restructuring into a single state machine.

1:01 pm

Sean Nash

This doesn't look like a valid substate. We should have an enum for valid substates. In default case, we should trigger a s/w fault and also set the state to a valid state (idle or something like t...

This doesn't look like a valid substate. We should have an enum for valid substates. In default case, we should trigger a s/w fault and also set the state to a valid state (idle or something like that).

12:53 pm

Sean Nash

I think /// was correct. // will not be seen by doxygen.

I think /// was correct. // will not be seen by doxygen.

11:03 am

Vinayakam Mani

Not clear, why we are checking fill and supply request here?

Not clear, why we are checking fill and supply request here?

10:24 am

Vinayakam Mani

we should use the functions defined in testsupport.c/h -> getU32OverrideValue, getF32OverrideValue based on data type. this needs to be fixed throughout the file.

we should use the functions defined in testsupport.c/h -> getU32OverrideValue, getF32OverrideValue based on data type. this needs to be fixed throughout the file.

10:19 am

Vinayakam Mani

space after if. please fix it throughout the files.

space after if. please fix it throughout the files.

10:17 am

Vinayakam Mani

I guess, Fill and Drain are priority items than the Supply request, which means upon request of fill and drain, state machine should service that operation. Also, setting supply request should be ...

I guess, Fill and Drain are priority items than the Supply request, which means upon request of fill and drain, state machine should service that operation.

Also, setting supply request should be based on the level sensor later (there shouldn't be any default request -> currently supply is assigned)