Clone Tools
  • last updated a few minutes ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
fix the typo.

fix the typo.

Delta instead of target conductivity?

Delta instead of target conductivity?

looks there are some more payloads in publish function. please add the other parameters here.

looks there are some more payloads in publish function. please add the other parameters here.

LDT-4000: updated message IDs. Updated test config for beta 1.9 and 2.0. implemented substitution pump module

    • -0
    • +112
    ./modules/substitution_pump.py
  1. … 1 more file in changeset.
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-4001_HDF - FW Implementation - 2/4:
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-4001_HDF - FW Implementation - 2/4:
Remove extra blank line.

Remove extra blank line.

LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-4002_HDF - FW Implementation - 3/4:
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-4002_HDF - FW Implementation - 3/4:
references to Denali has been removed

references to Denali has been removed

LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
Shouldn't we use Leahi instead of Denali?

Shouldn't we use Leahi instead of Denali?

LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3854_(DD) Chamber F level sensor not reporting the level properly
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3854_(DD) Chamber F level sensor not reporting the level properly
LDT-3854 dialin update for -chamber-f-level

LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3904_[OpMode] The operation mode broadcasts does not return the 3rd and 4th level modes
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3904_[OpMode] The operation mode broadcasts does not return the 3rd and 4th level modes
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3984_(DD, SW) D46 reads 0 with and without liquid in chamber
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3984_(DD, SW) D46 reads 0 with and without liquid in chamber
LDT-3984-unit-test-failure-fix

- Updated td_proxy - Added requests to UI_proxy - Updated generic override

  1. … 3 more files in changeset.
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-4188_SW/FW integration to run a Treatment from UI
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-4188_SW/FW integration to run a Treatment from UI
What's the point of this line if you overwrite the lvl_sen value in the next 2 lines? I think the second lvl_sen is not needed, the one without the offset.

What's the point of this line if you overwrite the lvl_sen value in the next 2 lines?
I think the second lvl_sen is not needed, the one without the offset.

LAST_DD_LEVL is in FW not in dialin. In dialin, you use the Num_of_levels, so this one is correct here. Example: In this case Num_of_levels is 4 (D6,D63,D98,D46), if in the override adding 4 to the...

LAST_DD_LEVL is in FW not in dialin.
In dialin, you use the Num_of_levels, so this one is correct here.
Example:
In this case Num_of_levels is 4 (D6,D63,D98,D46), if in the override adding 4 to the fp level sensor, which is 0, the payload will provide 4, which will be between the FIRST_FP_LEVL and LAST_FP_LEVL FW value as P25 index is 4.

Why increment the number when you didn't add a new sensor?

Why increment the number when you didn't add a new sensor?