ModeGenDialysate.c

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few seconds ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
I suspect this is temporary. If so, just add a TODO comment to restore later.

I suspect this is temporary. If so, just add a TODO comment to restore later.

there was an issue with my VM and Dara Navaei when fixed it this got deleted and he told me that it is okay to commit this.

there was an issue with my VM and Dara Navaei when fixed it this got deleted and he told me that it is okay to commit this.

changed.

changed.

updated.

updated.

done.

done.

done.

done.

changed.

changed.

changed.

changed.

Vinayakam Mani had it removed. Can you please let us know why you have this commented out in latest staging?

Vinayakam Mani had it removed. Can you please let us know why you have this commented out in latest staging?

Looks like we are doing a lot of the dialysate temp control in Gen Dialysate mode. Do we not do any heating in PreGen mode? Even if all dialysate heating is done in this mode, should we consider cr...

Looks like we are doing a lot of the dialysate temp control in Gen Dialysate mode. Do we not do any heating in PreGen mode?
Even if all dialysate heating is done in this mode, should we consider creating a service controller (like BC controller) to manage this complex temperature control?

Resolve merge conflicts.

Resolve merge conflicts.

Done.

Done.

Updated.

Updated.

copy paste error comment

copy paste error comment

Please convert bool expression to BOOL (TRUE or FALSE) before assigning (either in the expression with trinary or prior).

Please convert bool expression to BOOL (TRUE or FALSE) before assigning (either in the expression with trinary or prior).

Done

Done

Done.

Done.

Add a comment to right listing math functions used.

Add a comment to right listing math functions used.

Remove blank line.

Remove blank line.

Can you follow up with whoever commented it out and find out if that was intentional? And, if so, will it be coming back? And, if so, should we at least put a TODO on this to restore later?

Can you follow up with whoever commented it out and find out if that was intentional? And, if so, will it be coming back? And, if so, should we at least put a TODO on this to restore later?

Why not "TRUE == "?

Why not "TRUE == "?

Why not "TRUE == "?

Why not "TRUE == "?

Remove blank line.

Remove blank line.

Remove extra blank line.

Remove extra blank line.

Outputs in none now I think.

Outputs in none now I think.

Looks like you updated wrong function (the one below instead of this one). It's an output in function below and it's an input in this function.

Looks like you updated wrong function (the one below instead of this one). It's an output in function below and it's an input in this function.