Clone Tools
  • last updated a few seconds ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
Please consult the FW-SW integration xls file for MSG_ID reservations. Please add the ones you need to that list as without missing any reservations for IDs the randomly added IDs will be overwritt...

Please consult the FW-SW integration xls file for MSG_ID reservations.
Please add the ones you need to that list as without missing any reservations for IDs the randomly added IDs will be overwritten by reserved ones.

Instead of removing, could you move them to the bottom of the list to prevent exceptions being thrown?

Instead of removing, could you move them to the bottom of the list to prevent exceptions being thrown?

LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-4732_(Dialin) Dialin version should be included in the all system logs
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-4732_(Dialin) Dialin version should be included in the all system logs
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-4721_Add extra parameter to start pregen request
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-4721_Add extra parameter to start pregen request
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3735_System Data and Logs - DD - Non-Volatile Memory - 04: DEV - Feature Implementation
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3735_System Data and Logs - DD - Non-Volatile Memory - 04: DEV - Feature Implementation
references to Denali has been removed

references to Denali has been removed

Shouldn't we use Leahi instead of Denali?

Shouldn't we use Leahi instead of Denali?

LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3904_[OpMode] The operation mode broadcasts does not return the 3rd and 4th level modes
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3904_[OpMode] The operation mode broadcasts does not return the 3rd and 4th level modes
What's the point of this line if you overwrite the lvl_sen value in the next 2 lines? I think the second lvl_sen is not needed, the one without the offset.

What's the point of this line if you overwrite the lvl_sen value in the next 2 lines?
I think the second lvl_sen is not needed, the one without the offset.

LAST_DD_LEVL is in FW not in dialin. In dialin, you use the Num_of_levels, so this one is correct here. Example: In this case Num_of_levels is 4 (D6,D63,D98,D46), if in the override adding 4 to the...

LAST_DD_LEVL is in FW not in dialin.
In dialin, you use the Num_of_levels, so this one is correct here.
Example:
In this case Num_of_levels is 4 (D6,D63,D98,D46), if in the override adding 4 to the fp level sensor, which is 0, the payload will provide 4, which will be between the FIRST_FP_LEVL and LAST_FP_LEVL FW value as P25 index is 4.

Why increment the number when you didn't add a new sensor?

Why increment the number when you didn't add a new sensor?

This should be LAST_DD_LEVL not NUM_OF_LEVELS if DD and FP levels are in same enum

This should be LAST_DD_LEVL not NUM_OF_LEVELS if DD and FP levels are in same enum

LEVEL_OFFSET?

LEVEL_OFFSET?

LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3984_(DD, SW) D46 reads 0 with and without liquid in chamber
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3984_(DD, SW) D46 reads 0 with and without liquid in chamber
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3910_Request: add TD config flag so that alarms originating from other subsystems don't put the TD into fault mode
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3910_Request: add TD config flag so that alarms originating from other subsystems don't put the TD into fault mode
Typo, response

Typo, response

Typo, response

Typo, response