Clone Tools
  • last updated a few seconds ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
I do not see TD use case in any of the PI controller functions. so why TD for this function ?

I do not see TD use case in any of the PI controller functions. so why TD for this function ?

LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
Why do we have a local sub state variable that we don't do anything with?

Why do we have a local sub state variable that we don't do anything with?

This is to avoid compilation warning

This is to avoid compilation warning

I don't think these coefficient access functions need to be public. Consider making them private.

I don't think these coefficient access functions need to be public. Consider making them private.

These seem more like concentrate doses, not dialysate doses. Consider renaming.

These seem more like concentrate doses, not dialysate doses. Consider renaming.

What is this?

What is this?

Add blank line after declarations.

Add blank line after declarations.

Are these coming back? If so, add TODO comment to restore later. If not, delete them.

Are these coming back? If so, add TODO comment to restore later. If not, delete them.

else TD ?

else TD ?

This is a structure, not an enumeration.

This is a structure, not an enumeration.

LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
Bamboo Commit: Updated the Copyright section and replaced tabs with 4 spaces

  1. … 11 more files in changeset.
LDT-3344 resolved merge conflicts with staging

  1. … 4 more files in changeset.
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-3344_Firmware support for Beta 2 FPGA updates.
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-3344_Firmware support for Beta 2 FPGA updates.
This is total mess up . that is what I want it a clean implementation. created a ticket LDT-3563 and closing all review comments.

This is total mess up . that is what I want it a clean implementation. created a ticket LDT-3563 and closing all review comments.

Removing all the review comments and created a ticket to handle it in separate ticket -LDT-3563

Removing all the review comments and created a ticket to handle it in separate ticket -LDT-3563

removed.

removed.

changed.

changed.

removed.

removed.

the 2nd if statement for beta 1.0 is an ask from systems team to raise fault alarm if user by mistake enable Beta 2.0 config when Beta1.0 is active

the 2nd if statement for beta 1.0 is an ask from systems team to raise fault alarm if user by mistake enable Beta 2.0 config when Beta1.0 is active

Noe says we can distinguish between beta 1.9 and 2.0 w/ ID (4 and 6). We still need test configs for beta 1.0 stuff and non-fpga differences. We can use DD fpga ID # here in this macro instead of t...

Noe says we can distinguish between beta 1.9 and 2.0 w/ ID (4 and 6).
We still need test configs for beta 1.0 stuff and non-fpga differences.
We can use DD fpga ID # here in this macro instead of test config.
Since this is all temporary, I'm not that concerned about how we do this so long as it works.

I think Sameer is saying that the monitor should just call one get level function in FPGA and that one function (in FpgaDD.c) would handle all of this beta 1/1.9/2.0 stuff. I agree, but didn't comm...

I think Sameer is saying that the monitor should just call one get level function in FPGA and that one function (in FpgaDD.c) would handle all of this beta 1/1.9/2.0 stuff.
I agree, but didn't comment on it because it's all temporary anyway.

Why do we need a get function to call another get function? The caller of this function should just call getFPGAGPIOStatus() and then we wouldn't need this.

Why do we need a get function to call another get function? The caller of this function should just call getFPGAGPIOStatus() and then we wouldn't need this.

Move this up to public definitions section.

Move this up to public definitions section.

LDT-3344 fixed typo in function hheader

readFloaterLevelStatus is higher level functions that give the data from the FPGA. Reason why we had these get functions here is, based on the FPGA response we translate it to the user understandab...

readFloaterLevelStatus is higher level functions that give the data from the FPGA.
Reason why we had these get functions here is, based on the FPGA response we translate it to the user understandable enum values (low, medium, high)