Clone Tools
  • last updated a few seconds ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
We will need to get the event_id first, to know how to process the content as Operation status content is different from rest. So this line is just for getting the event id, and based on the resul...

We will need to get the event_id first, to know how to process the content as Operation status content is different from rest.

So this line is just for getting the event id, and based on the result, process the rest into the correct variables

removed

removed

fixed

fixed

remove if we are sure about the message ID

remove if we are sure about the message ID

Will we need this after adding the below code?

Will we need this after adding the below code?

Fix typo

Fix typo

LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-5482_[Dry Self Test] Update the module to match the current dev changes
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-5482_[Dry Self Test] Update the module to match the current dev changes
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-5205_[DD] Update NVM records architecture in Dialin
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-5205_[DD] Update NVM records architecture in Dialin
references to Denali has been removed

references to Denali has been removed

Shouldn't we use Leahi instead of Denali?

Shouldn't we use Leahi instead of Denali?

LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3904_[OpMode] The operation mode broadcasts does not return the 3rd and 4th level modes
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3904_[OpMode] The operation mode broadcasts does not return the 3rd and 4th level modes
What's the point of this line if you overwrite the lvl_sen value in the next 2 lines? I think the second lvl_sen is not needed, the one without the offset.

What's the point of this line if you overwrite the lvl_sen value in the next 2 lines?
I think the second lvl_sen is not needed, the one without the offset.

LAST_DD_LEVL is in FW not in dialin. In dialin, you use the Num_of_levels, so this one is correct here. Example: In this case Num_of_levels is 4 (D6,D63,D98,D46), if in the override adding 4 to the...

LAST_DD_LEVL is in FW not in dialin.
In dialin, you use the Num_of_levels, so this one is correct here.
Example:
In this case Num_of_levels is 4 (D6,D63,D98,D46), if in the override adding 4 to the fp level sensor, which is 0, the payload will provide 4, which will be between the FIRST_FP_LEVL and LAST_FP_LEVL FW value as P25 index is 4.

Why increment the number when you didn't add a new sensor?

Why increment the number when you didn't add a new sensor?

This should be LAST_DD_LEVL not NUM_OF_LEVELS if DD and FP levels are in same enum

This should be LAST_DD_LEVL not NUM_OF_LEVELS if DD and FP levels are in same enum

LEVEL_OFFSET?

LEVEL_OFFSET?

LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3984_(DD, SW) D46 reads 0 with and without liquid in chamber
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3984_(DD, SW) D46 reads 0 with and without liquid in chamber
Typo, response

Typo, response

Typo, response

Typo, response

Fix the header

Fix the header

LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3824_[Leahi-TestCommon] Enhance state machine
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3824_[Leahi-TestCommon] Enhance state machine