leahi-dialin / leahi_dialin / common

fp_defs.py

Clone Tools

Stats

Commits this week: 2
Total Committers: 5
Last Commit: 19 Aug
Commits this week: 2

Lines of code count not available

Commit Activity

Commits By Day In Week
52 week commits volume
Commits By Day In Week
Commits by day
Commits By Day In Week
Commits by hour
Commits By Hour In Day
Commit calendar
 

Most active committers (90 days)

loading
loading
  • last updated a few seconds ago
All Commits Reviews
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
Today
1 min ago

Zoltan Miskolci

No, it won't cause an error. The execute() function checks for the leahi-common folder existence first, if it does not exists, it returns, skipping the whole update process. Not everyone have acces...

No, it won't cause an error. The execute() function checks for the leahi-common folder existence first, if it does not exists, it returns, skipping the whole update process.
Not everyone have access to that folder and a whl file don't need to run the update every time, it's more like for those who develop the code.

Wednesday 19 Aug
10:34 pm

Michael Garthwaite

This will be called when a user imports leahi-dialin, right? ( import leahi-dialin ) and thus cause a traceback cause the user wont have the path to the header files required for this execute call....

This will be called when a user imports leahi-dialin, right? ( import leahi-dialin ) and thus cause a traceback cause the user wont have the path to the header files required for this execute call.

suggest keeping the call in if _name_ == '_main_': of enum_update and running that

10:26 pm

Michael Garthwaite

Tuesday 18 Aug
11:45 am

Raghu Kallala

Thursday 13 Aug
1:21 pm

Raghu Kallala

10:42 am

Zoltan Miskolci

We will need to get the event_id first, to know how to process the content as Operation status content is different from rest. So this line is just for getting the event id, and based on the resul...

We will need to get the event_id first, to know how to process the content as Operation status content is different from rest.

So this line is just for getting the event id, and based on the result, process the rest into the correct variables

10:40 am

Zoltan Miskolci

removed

removed

10:37 am

Zoltan Miskolci

fixed

fixed

10:05 am

Raghu Kallala

remove if we are sure about the message ID

remove if we are sure about the message ID

10:02 am

Raghu Kallala

Will we need this after adding the below code?

Will we need this after adding the below code?

9:57 am

Raghu Kallala

Fix typo

Fix typo

Wednesday 12 Aug
1:29 pm

Dara Navaei

LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-5482_[Dry Self Test] Update the module to match the current dev changes
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-5482_[Dry Self Test] Update the module to match the current dev changes
Tuesday 11 Aug
2:59 pm

Dara Navaei

LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-5205_[DD] Update NVM records architecture in Dialin
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-5205_[DD] Update NVM records architecture in Dialin
Monday 01 Jun
4:20 pm

Zoltan Miskolci

8:01 am

Raghu Kallala

Friday 29 May
10:05 am

Michael Garthwaite

Thursday 21 May
5:09 pm

Zoltan Miskolci

references to Denali has been removed

references to Denali has been removed

7:44 am

Raghu Kallala

Shouldn't we use Leahi instead of Denali?

Shouldn't we use Leahi instead of Denali?

Monday 04 May
5:46 pm

Dara Navaei

LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3904_[OpMode] The operation mode broadcasts does not return the 3rd and 4th level modes
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3904_[OpMode] The operation mode broadcasts does not return the 3rd and 4th level modes
Thursday 30 Apr
2:23 pm

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil

Tuesday 28 Apr
9:30 am

Zoltan Miskolci

What's the point of this line if you overwrite the lvl_sen value in the next 2 lines? I think the second lvl_sen is not needed, the one without the offset.

What's the point of this line if you overwrite the lvl_sen value in the next 2 lines?
I think the second lvl_sen is not needed, the one without the offset.

9:29 am

Zoltan Miskolci

LAST_DD_LEVL is in FW not in dialin. In dialin, you use the Num_of_levels, so this one is correct here. Example: In this case Num_of_levels is 4 (D6,D63,D98,D46), if in the override adding 4 to the...

LAST_DD_LEVL is in FW not in dialin.
In dialin, you use the Num_of_levels, so this one is correct here.
Example:
In this case Num_of_levels is 4 (D6,D63,D98,D46), if in the override adding 4 to the fp level sensor, which is 0, the payload will provide 4, which will be between the FIRST_FP_LEVL and LAST_FP_LEVL FW value as P25 index is 4.

9:15 am

Zoltan Miskolci

Why increment the number when you didn't add a new sensor?

Why increment the number when you didn't add a new sensor?

9:02 am

Raghu Kallala

This should be LAST_DD_LEVL not NUM_OF_LEVELS if DD and FP levels are in same enum

This should be LAST_DD_LEVL not NUM_OF_LEVELS if DD and FP levels are in same enum

9:00 am

Raghu Kallala

LEVEL_OFFSET?

LEVEL_OFFSET?

Monday 27 Apr
8:46 pm

Sean Nash and Raghu Kallala

Thursday 23 Apr
8:02 am

Dara Navaei

LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3984_(DD, SW) D46 reads 0 with and without liquid in chamber
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3984_(DD, SW) D46 reads 0 with and without liquid in chamber
Wednesday 08 Apr
11:26 am

Zoltan Miskolci

10:01 am

Michael Garthwaite and Raghu Kallala

9:48 am

Raghu Kallala

Typo, response

Typo, response