dd-firmware

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few seconds ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
LDT-3344 resolved merge conflicts with staging

    • -128
    • +149
    /firmware/App/Controllers/Valves.c
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-3344_Firmware support for Beta 2 FPGA updates.
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-3344_Firmware support for Beta 2 FPGA updates.
LDT-3103 special build

LDT-3103 special build requested changes

    • -3
    • +27
    /firmware/App/Modes/ModeGenDialysate.c
    • -1
    • +1
    /firmware/App/Modes/ModeGenDialysate.h
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
LDT-2004 removed the blank line

LDT-2004 Rearranged the code after the restructuring was misplaced

Bamboo Commit: Updated DDCommon.h with build versions from Bamboo.

Bamboo Commit: Updated the Copyright section and replaced tabs with 4 spaces

    • -2
    • +2
    /firmware/App/Drivers/BloodLeakDriver.h
Merged LDT-3552

This is total mess up . that is what I want it a clean implementation. created a ticket LDT-3563 and closing all review comments.

This is total mess up . that is what I want it a clean implementation. created a ticket LDT-3563 and closing all review comments.

Removing all the review comments and created a ticket to handle it in separate ticket -LDT-3563

Removing all the review comments and created a ticket to handle it in separate ticket -LDT-3563

removed.

removed.

changed.

changed.

removed.

removed.

LDT-3344 addressed code review comments

    • -21
    • +1
    /firmware/App/Controllers/RinsePump.c
the 2nd if statement for beta 1.0 is an ask from systems team to raise fault alarm if user by mistake enable Beta 2.0 config when Beta1.0 is active

the 2nd if statement for beta 1.0 is an ask from systems team to raise fault alarm if user by mistake enable Beta 2.0 config when Beta1.0 is active

Noe says we can distinguish between beta 1.9 and 2.0 w/ ID (4 and 6). We still need test configs for beta 1.0 stuff and non-fpga differences. We can use DD fpga ID # here in this macro instead of t...

Noe says we can distinguish between beta 1.9 and 2.0 w/ ID (4 and 6).
We still need test configs for beta 1.0 stuff and non-fpga differences.
We can use DD fpga ID # here in this macro instead of test config.
Since this is all temporary, I'm not that concerned about how we do this so long as it works.

I think Sameer is saying that the monitor should just call one get level function in FPGA and that one function (in FpgaDD.c) would handle all of this beta 1/1.9/2.0 stuff. I agree, but didn't comm...

I think Sameer is saying that the monitor should just call one get level function in FPGA and that one function (in FpgaDD.c) would handle all of this beta 1/1.9/2.0 stuff.
I agree, but didn't comment on it because it's all temporary anyway.

Why do we need a get function to call another get function? The caller of this function should just call getFPGAGPIOStatus() and then we wouldn't need this.

Why do we need a get function to call another get function? The caller of this function should just call getFPGAGPIOStatus() and then we wouldn't need this.

Move this up to public definitions section.

Move this up to public definitions section.

These don't need to be initialized.

These don't need to be initialized.

Outputs is none now I think.

Outputs is none now I think.

LDT-3344 fixed typo in function hheader

readFloaterLevelStatus is higher level functions that give the data from the FPGA. Reason why we had these get functions here is, based on the FPGA response we translate it to the user understandab...

readFloaterLevelStatus is higher level functions that give the data from the FPGA.
Reason why we had these get functions here is, based on the FPGA response we translate it to the user understandable enum values (low, medium, high)

This is a reset call, as the default requirement is to be on Beta 1.9 HW The logic is checking if the user is resetting the Beta 2.0 config, if yes, we will have to fall back to the Beta 1.9 FPGA r...

This is a reset call, as the default requirement is to be on Beta 1.9 HW
The logic is checking if the user is resetting the Beta 2.0 config, if yes, we will have to fall back to the Beta 1.9 FPGA registers