leahi-dialin

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few minutes ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
LDT-4000: swapped override requests.

LDT-4000: updated message IDs. Updated test config for beta 1.9 and 2.0. implemented substitution pump module

    • -1
    • +1
    /leahi_dialin/common/test_config_defs.py
    • -1
    • +3
    /leahi_dialin/dd/dialysate_delivery.py
    • -0
    • +112
    /leahi_dialin/dd/modules/substitution_pump.py
Merge branch 'staging' into LDT-4000-hdf-fw-implementation-1-4

Merge branch LDT-3984-unit-test-failure-fix into staging

Merge branch 'staging' into LDT-4000-hdf-fw-implementation-1-4

Merge branch 'LDT-4188-sw-fw-integration-to-run-a-trea' into staging

LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3984_(DD, SW) D46 reads 0 with and without liquid in chamber
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-3984_(DD, SW) D46 reads 0 with and without liquid in chamber
LDT-3984-unit-test-failure-fix

LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-4000_HDF - FW Implementation - 1/4:
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-4000_HDF - FW Implementation - 1/4:
LDT-4000: fixed unit testing

Merge branch LDT-3984-dd-sw-d46-reads-0-with-and-with into staging

Merge branch staging into LDT-3984-dd-sw-d46-reads-0-with-and-with

- Updated td_proxy - Added requests to UI_proxy - Updated generic override

    • -21
    • +31
    /leahi_dialin/dd/proxies/td_proxy.py
    • -19
    • +51
    /leahi_dialin/td/modules/alarms.py
    • -40
    • +84
    /leahi_dialin/td/proxies/ui_proxy.py
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-4188_SW/FW integration to run a Treatment from UI
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-4188_SW/FW integration to run a Treatment from UI
LDT-3984 addressed review comments

What's the point of this line if you overwrite the lvl_sen value in the next 2 lines? I think the second lvl_sen is not needed, the one without the offset.

What's the point of this line if you overwrite the lvl_sen value in the next 2 lines?
I think the second lvl_sen is not needed, the one without the offset.

LAST_DD_LEVL is in FW not in dialin. In dialin, you use the Num_of_levels, so this one is correct here. Example: In this case Num_of_levels is 4 (D6,D63,D98,D46), if in the override adding 4 to the...

LAST_DD_LEVL is in FW not in dialin.
In dialin, you use the Num_of_levels, so this one is correct here.
Example:
In this case Num_of_levels is 4 (D6,D63,D98,D46), if in the override adding 4 to the fp level sensor, which is 0, the payload will provide 4, which will be between the FIRST_FP_LEVL and LAST_FP_LEVL FW value as P25 index is 4.

Why increment the number when you didn't add a new sensor?

Why increment the number when you didn't add a new sensor?

This should be LAST_DD_LEVL not NUM_OF_LEVELS if DD and FP levels are in same enum

This should be LAST_DD_LEVL not NUM_OF_LEVELS if DD and FP levels are in same enum

LEVEL_OFFSET?

LEVEL_OFFSET?

LDT-3984 fix for conductivie level sensors d46, d63,d98

LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-4213_NON-FEATURE: SW Misc & Enhc - SW - 01 - Create Rx - Final Flag Prm - R&I
LEAHI-DIALIN-LDT-4213_NON-FEATURE: SW Misc & Enhc - SW - 01 - Create Rx - Final Flag Prm - R&I
Should this be an enumeration somewhere?

Should this be an enumeration somewhere?