leahi-fwcommon

Clone Tools

Stats

Commits this week: 23
Total Committers: 13
Last Commit: 07:13
Commits this week: 23

Lines of code count not available

Commit Activity

Commits By Day In Week
52 week commits volume
Commits By Day In Week
Commits by day
Commits By Day In Week
Commits by hour
Commits By Hour In Day
Commit calendar
 

Most active committers (90 days)

loading
loading
  • last updated a few seconds ago
All Commits Reviews
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
Today
21 hrs ago

Sean Nash

Remove extra blank line.

Remove extra blank line.

Sunday 03 May
11:59 pm

Sean Nash

Why is this service prefixed with "Tx"? Also, Praneeth and I agreed to put these state machine services into a sub-folder of Services. See how he did it and do the same.

Why is this service prefixed with "Tx"?
Also, Praneeth and I agreed to put these state machine services into a sub-folder of Services. See how he did it and do the same.

11:57 pm

Sean Nash

DrySelfTests unit.

DrySelfTests unit.

11:57 pm

Sean Nash

DrySelfTests unit initialized.

DrySelfTests unit initialized.

11:56 pm

Sean Nash

Remove extra blank line.

Remove extra blank line.

11:55 pm

Sean Nash

.. handles dry self-tests execution for pre-treatment and treatment modes.

.. handles dry self-tests execution for pre-treatment and treatment modes.

11:54 pm

Sean Nash

Should be in "", not <>. And should be placed alphabetically down before TxParams.h.

Should be in "", not <>. And should be placed alphabetically down before TxParams.h.

11:52 pm

Sean Nash

Calling signal function here seems circular (that's how we got here in the first place). Shouldn't we set state to the install state here instead?

Calling signal function here seems circular (that's how we got here in the first place).
Shouldn't we set state to the install state here instead?

11:50 pm

Sean Nash

Put before TxParams.

Put before TxParams.

11:50 pm

Sean Nash

I think Praneeth created a function for this. Make sure they're identical.

I think Praneeth created a function for this. Make sure they're identical.

11:46 pm

Sean Nash

11:46 pm

Sean Nash

11:45 pm

Sean Nash

11:08 pm

Sean Nash

Why are we removing this TODO comment? It looks like we should keep it.

Why are we removing this TODO comment? It looks like we should keep it.

11:06 pm

Sean Nash

Do we need TODO comments to restore these alarms later?

Do we need TODO comments to restore these alarms later?

11:06 pm

Sean Nash

What is the point of this message?

What is the point of this message?

11:01 pm

Sean Nash

Looks like we need a TODO comment to restore these checks later.

Looks like we need a TODO comment to restore these checks later.

11:59 am

Sean Nash

We should just have 1 of these. Let's have TD always working in mL and mL/min, and we'll just convert before sending to UI or after receiving from UI.

We should just have 1 of these. Let's have TD always working in mL and mL/min, and we'll just convert before sending to UI or after receiving from UI.

Saturday 02 May
4:33 pm

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil

we don't need pragma alignment on enums, could you exclude it ?

we don't need pragma alignment on enums, could you exclude it ?

4:32 pm

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil

Friday 01 May
8:07 am

Raghu Kallala

Updated to ml/min, except for broadcast in treatment mode

Updated to ml/min, except for broadcast in treatment mode

Thursday 30 Apr
1:41 pm

Sean Nash

What TD does with UF rate is mostly to tell DD what rate we want. DD wants mL/min. TD can keep L/hr and convert to mL/min every time it needs to send DD a message or it can keep mL/min and convert ...

What TD does with UF rate is mostly to tell DD what rate we want. DD wants mL/min. TD can keep L/hr and convert to mL/min every time it needs to send DD a message or it can keep mL/min and convert to L/hr every time it needs to send UI a message. Either way works for me.

12:21 pm

Raghu Kallala

Changed to U32

Changed to U32

12:21 pm

Raghu Kallala

we are sending a message ack as response in the handler of this message request

we are sending a message ack as response in the handler of this message request

11:53 am

Raghu Kallala

Other existing set functions in TD is using UF in liter and rate in L/hr Shall I change all of them? Which might impact how systems is sending this info(L/hr or ml/min) in their scripts

Other existing set functions in TD is using UF in liter and rate in L/hr

Shall I change all of them? Which might impact how systems is sending this info(L/hr or ml/min) in their scripts

11:21 am

Vinayakam Mani

11:10 am

Sean Nash

I think DD (and TD) want mL/min and UI wants L/hr. TxParams should have already calculated this rate (in mL/min) and should probably have a get function you can call from here to access it. When se...

I think DD (and TD) want mL/min and UI wants L/hr. TxParams should have already calculated this rate (in mL/min) and should probably have a get function you can call from here to access it. When sending UF rate to UI, we would convert back to L/hr first, but everywhere else we would work with mL/min.

11:01 am

Sean Nash

Remove extra blank line.

Remove extra blank line.

11:00 am

Sean Nash

Remove extra space before function name.

Remove extra space before function name.

11:00 am

Sean Nash

This is not a Dialin message, so move up above all of these "test" functions.

This is not a Dialin message, so move up above all of these "test" functions.