leahi-fwcommon

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few seconds ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
Merge branch 'staging' of bitbucket.org:diality-cloud/leahi-fwcommon into LDT-2240-disposable-tube-set-self-test

Please update the function name : testDDFloaterLevelStateOverride

Please update the function name : testDDFloaterLevelStateOverride

LDT-4188 removed struct packing for enum type.

Remove extra blank line.

Remove extra blank line.

Why is this service prefixed with "Tx"? Also, Praneeth and I agreed to put these state machine services into a sub-folder of Services. See how he did it and do the same.

Why is this service prefixed with "Tx"?
Also, Praneeth and I agreed to put these state machine services into a sub-folder of Services. See how he did it and do the same.

DrySelfTests unit.

DrySelfTests unit.

DrySelfTests unit initialized.

DrySelfTests unit initialized.

Remove extra blank line.

Remove extra blank line.

.. handles dry self-tests execution for pre-treatment and treatment modes.

.. handles dry self-tests execution for pre-treatment and treatment modes.

Should be in "", not <>. And should be placed alphabetically down before TxParams.h.

Should be in "", not <>. And should be placed alphabetically down before TxParams.h.

Calling signal function here seems circular (that's how we got here in the first place). Shouldn't we set state to the install state here instead?

Calling signal function here seems circular (that's how we got here in the first place).
Shouldn't we set state to the install state here instead?

Put before TxParams.

Put before TxParams.

I think Praneeth created a function for this. Make sure they're identical.

I think Praneeth created a function for this. Make sure they're identical.

Why are we removing this TODO comment? It looks like we should keep it.

Why are we removing this TODO comment? It looks like we should keep it.

Do we need TODO comments to restore these alarms later?

Do we need TODO comments to restore these alarms later?

What is the point of this message?

What is the point of this message?

Looks like we need a TODO comment to restore these checks later.

Looks like we need a TODO comment to restore these checks later.

LDT-3259 added DD to UI and UI to DD CAN channels

We should just have 1 of these. Let's have TD always working in mL and mL/min, and we'll just convert before sending to UI or after receiving from UI.

We should just have 1 of these. Let's have TD always working in mL and mL/min, and we'll just convert before sending to UI or after receiving from UI.

we don't need pragma alignment on enums, could you exclude it ?

we don't need pragma alignment on enums, could you exclude it ?

Merge branch 'staging' into LDT-3259-software-update---td-firmware

LDT-3505: Merged latest staging into LDT-3505

Updated to ml/min, except for broadcast in treatment mode

Updated to ml/min, except for broadcast in treatment mode

WIP on develop

fixed commit loss. message payload no longer existed in branch

Merge branch 'LDT-4000-hdf-fw-implementation-1-4' into develop