leahi-common

DDDefs.h

Clone Tools

Stats

Commits this week: 1
Total Committers: 12
Last Commit: 16 Mar
Commits this week: 1

Lines of code count not available

Commit Activity

Commits By Day In Week
52 week commits volume
Commits By Day In Week
Commits by day
Commits By Day In Week
Commits by hour
Commits By Hour In Day
Commit calendar
 

Most active committers (90 days)

loading
loading
  • last updated a few seconds ago
All Commits Reviews
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
Thursday 19 Mar
3:47 pm

Dara Navaei

LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
3:47 pm

Dara Navaei

LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
Monday 16 Mar
10:58 am

Michael Garthwaite

Merge branch 'LDT-2004-v2-conductivity-sensors' into develop

Options
    • -1
    • +18
    /DDDefs.h
Wednesday 11 Mar
2:09 pm

Sean Nash

I believe we will want BC control during ISO UF state.

I believe we will want BC control during ISO UF state.

2:07 pm

Sean Nash

Remove blank line and comment saying we're not doing anything (because now we're doing something).

Remove blank line and comment saying we're not doing anything (because now we're doing something).

2:05 pm

Sean Nash

isBalChamberSwitchingOffRequested is an output.

isBalChamberSwitchingOffRequested is an output.

2:03 pm

Sean Nash

Should we set the other switch to FALSE, just in case?

Should we set the other switch to FALSE, just in case?

Monday 02 Mar
3:12 pm

Michael Garthwaite

LDT-2004: moved conductivity sensor enum to dd defs so both drivers can use it. Removed ifdef for teensy in relation to its overrides.

Options
    • -1
    • +18
    /DDDefs.h
  2. … 1 more file in changeset.
Friday 27 Feb
8:48 am

Sean Nash

Has integrity unit been added to TD project?

Has integrity unit been added to TD project?

8:44 am

Sean Nash

Where are these being triggered?

Where are these being triggered?

8:32 am

Sean Nash

Is this necessary? If so, why?

Is this necessary? If so, why?

Thursday 26 Feb
9:53 am

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

LDT-1195: Renamed balancing chamber start state to idle state.

Options
    • -2
    • +1
    /DDDefs.h
Wednesday 25 Feb
3:31 pm

Dara Navaei

LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-1195_DD: Request for a variable for balancing chamber switching to be active (T/F)
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-1195_DD: Request for a variable for balancing chamber switching to be active (T/F)
3:26 pm

Vendor - TEL - Arpita Srivastava

LDT-1195: Added balancing chamber idle state

Options
    • -0
    • +1
    /DDDefs.h
Tuesday 24 Feb
11:55 am

Vendor - TEL - Jashwant Gantyada

10:38 am

Dara Navaei

Bamboo Commit: Updated the Copyright section and replaced tabs with 4 spaces

Options
    • -2
    • +2
    /DDDefs.h
  2. … 1 more file in changeset.
10:35 am

Raghu Kallala , Vinayakam Mani and Sean Nash

Monday 23 Feb
1:19 pm

Raghu Kallala

LDT-3344 merge latest from staging

Options
    • -3
    • +51
    /DDDefs.h
1:18 pm

Vendor - TEL - Jashwant Gantyada

LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-3344_Firmware support for Beta 2 FPGA updates.
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-3344_Firmware support for Beta 2 FPGA updates.
4:00 am

Dara Navaei

LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
LEAHI-DD-FIRMWARE-LDT-2004_Dialysate Composition - DD
Friday 20 Feb
2:19 pm

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil

This is total mess up . that is what I want it a clean implementation. created a ticket LDT-3563 and closing all review comments.

This is total mess up . that is what I want it a clean implementation. created a ticket LDT-3563 and closing all review comments.

2:17 pm

Vendor - TEL - Sameer Poyil

Removing all the review comments and created a ticket to handle it in separate ticket -LDT-3563

Removing all the review comments and created a ticket to handle it in separate ticket -LDT-3563

1:42 pm

Vendor - TEL - Jashwant Gantyada

removed.

removed.

1:42 pm

Vendor - TEL - Jashwant Gantyada

changed.

changed.

1:41 pm

Vendor - TEL - Jashwant Gantyada

removed.

removed.

12:50 pm

Raghu Kallala

the 2nd if statement for beta 1.0 is an ask from systems team to raise fault alarm if user by mistake enable Beta 2.0 config when Beta1.0 is active

the 2nd if statement for beta 1.0 is an ask from systems team to raise fault alarm if user by mistake enable Beta 2.0 config when Beta1.0 is active

11:03 am

Sean Nash

Noe says we can distinguish between beta 1.9 and 2.0 w/ ID (4 and 6). We still need test configs for beta 1.0 stuff and non-fpga differences. We can use DD fpga ID # here in this macro instead of t...

Noe says we can distinguish between beta 1.9 and 2.0 w/ ID (4 and 6).
We still need test configs for beta 1.0 stuff and non-fpga differences.
We can use DD fpga ID # here in this macro instead of test config.
Since this is all temporary, I'm not that concerned about how we do this so long as it works.

10:22 am

Sean Nash

I think Sameer is saying that the monitor should just call one get level function in FPGA and that one function (in FpgaDD.c) would handle all of this beta 1/1.9/2.0 stuff. I agree, but didn't comm...

I think Sameer is saying that the monitor should just call one get level function in FPGA and that one function (in FpgaDD.c) would handle all of this beta 1/1.9/2.0 stuff.
I agree, but didn't comment on it because it's all temporary anyway.

9:59 am

Sean Nash

Why do we need a get function to call another get function? The caller of this function should just call getFPGAGPIOStatus() and then we wouldn't need this.

Why do we need a get function to call another get function? The caller of this function should just call getFPGAGPIOStatus() and then we wouldn't need this.

9:46 am

Sean Nash

Move this up to public definitions section.

Move this up to public definitions section.